Been thinking about the penalty angle...

[Damned Thing]

The announcers sucked Luck's jock all game because he could create penalties with his cadence, yet complained afterward that the Eagles somehow don't deserve their win due to a single failure by the refs in the Eagles favor. Does that mean that the Eagles' play after that call was meaningless? Were the refs expected to work only in Indy's favor?

Just some rhetorical musings, I guess, but if you live by the penalty, you can't really complain when you die by it.