Originally posted by Ground_Meat
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Should they let Peters come back in 2020?
Collapse
X
-
-
If you could get him to agree to being the 6th lineman and accept a one year deal at 6th man money, sure. But I think somebody out there is going to give him two years at starter money. At that point, you let him go.
Leave a comment:
-
I'd be ok with them signing him to a one year deal worth his market. Quality depth at that position doesn't have to be a negative thing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by art vandelay View PostI know I'm in the minority but I wouldn't see this as a Sproles-type move. They've needed Peters over the past two years and he's played pretty well. I don't think they should move on just because they need to get younger and they have a first invested in Dillard. Injuries are definitely a concern, but considering how common they are on the OL, I like the flexibility of having both Big V and Dillard as backups.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BigSlizz View Post
By "Sproles type move" do you mean they just let him retire after he gets hurt early in the season where he was largely ineffective?
You guys are probably right. I just think there's a bit of a perception that Peters has already played a year or two on lifetime achievement contracts, when he's actually been good the past couple seasons.Last edited by art vandelay; 02-08-2020, 12:47 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BigSlizz View Post
By "Sproles type move" do you mean they just let him retire after he gets hurt early in the season where he was largely ineffective?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by art vandelay View PostI know I'm in the minority but I wouldn't see this as a Sproles-type move. They've needed Peters over the past two years and he's played pretty well. I don't think they should move on just because they need to get younger and they have a first invested in Dillard. Injuries are definitely a concern, but considering how common they are on the OL, I like the flexibility of having both Big V and Dillard as backups.Last edited by BigSlizz; 02-07-2020, 11:48 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
thought I saw him in the pro bowl a couple weeks ago...I like dillard at LT and Peters at LG for the next season,,that would be a great left side,,Its up to Peters,,,,because
He made the pro bowl as a tackle,,,in his mind,,he's a probowler...so we will see what happensLast edited by TRENT; 02-07-2020, 10:47 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
No. They need to learn from their mistakes...they’ve signed too many guys that they shoulda let walk / cut. JP is an all-time great, but we drafted Dillard and it’s time for him to take over.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by art vandelay View PostI know I'm in the minority but I wouldn't see this as a Sproles-type move. They've needed Peters over the past two years and he's played pretty well. I don't think they should move on just because they need to get younger and they have a first invested in Dillard. Injuries are definitely a concern, but considering how common they are on the OL, I like the flexibility of having both Big V and Dillard as backups.
Leave a comment:
-
Should they let Peters come back in 2020?
I know I'm in the minority but I wouldn't see this as a Sproles-type move. They've needed Peters over the past two years and he's played pretty well. I don't think they should move on just because they need to get younger and they have a first invested in Dillard. Injuries are definitely a concern, but considering how common they are on the OL, I like the flexibility of having both Big V and Dillard as backups.Tags: None
Leave a comment: