Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Foles couldn't beat out Trubisky for starting QB

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DEERSPINE GUY
    replied
    Originally posted by Big Little View Post

    NICE a slag argument!! I smell Football season!!!

    FLY EAGLES FLY!!
    I SMELL SOMETHING....
    NOT SURE......
    WAIT.......
    YEA.....SMEGMA SNAIL SLIME.......

    Leave a comment:


  • Big Little
    replied
    Originally posted by slag View Post

    I think Brady's resume is relevant when the discussion started in the context of Foles' resume ... and, as for the Super Bowl, I don't thing the Eagles won that game because Foles outplayed Brady ... they both played well enough to win it ... and, as previously indicated, its a hell of a compliment to Foles that he played on that stage as well as Brady did on a 500-yard day ... xxoo

    EDITED TO ADD: I'm extending this frankly stupid argument primarily because I've been Jonesing for a football vortex in this fucking pandemic for a while now
    NICE a slag argument!! I smell Football season!!!

    FLY EAGLES FLY!!

    Leave a comment:


  • art vandelay
    replied
    Originally posted by slag View Post
    If you had said that you don't give a fuck if Foles can't beat out Minchew or Trubisky because he won the Super Bowl for the Eagles ... fine ... neither do I.
    I would guess that this was the point of McCarthy's post, and he only said "beat out Brady" because that was the language Sparty used. At least that was my takeaway.

    Leave a comment:


  • slag
    replied
    Originally posted by McCarthy12 View Post

    1. I strenously object (A Few Good Men reference) to your raising Brady's other SB victories. We're talking about who outplayed who in one game. Completely irrelevant.

    2. I addressed his 500 passing yards by pointing out stats that, IMO, paint a picture of two pretty even performances. I'll break the tie with the guy who was more clutch and won the game. You apparently think that is a very unreasonable position, which confuses me.

    3.
    I think Brady's resume is relevant when the discussion started in the context of Foles' resume ... and, as for the Super Bowl, I don't thing the Eagles won that game because Foles outplayed Brady ... they both played well enough to win it ... and, as previously indicated, its a hell of a compliment to Foles that he played on that stage as well as Brady did on a 500-yard day ... xxoo

    EDITED TO ADD: I'm extending this frankly stupid argument primarily because I've been Jonesing for a football vortex in this fucking pandemic for a while now
    Last edited by slag; 09-07-2020, 08:17 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Melchior
    replied
    Also, the Ealges had the 5th overall defense per DVOA. #1 Rushing/#8 Passing defense. Patriots had the 31st ranked defense. 23rd against the run and 30th against the pass.

    https://www.footballoutsiders.com/st...m-defense/2017

    Leave a comment:


  • McCarthy12
    replied
    Originally posted by slag View Post

    Come on what?

    It cracks me up when fans of a team get their briefs in a bunch over someone else not blindly sucking the hometown dick.

    If you had said that you don't give a fuck if Foles can't beat out Minchew or Trubisky because he won the Super Bowl for the Eagles ... fine ... neither do I.

    But suggesting that he "beat out" a guy with six total rings who threw for 500 yards in the same game, simply because the other guys' team lost that game, is horse shit and you know it.

    And my point has nothing to do with Pats fans taking solace either ... but I'm pretty sure you know that also.

    EDITED TO ADD: And if you think about it ... my statement about it being unfair to single out Brady as who Foles "beat out" in that game is actually a compliment to Foles.
    1. I strenously object (A Few Good Men reference) to your raising Brady's other SB victories. We're talking about who outplayed who in one game. Completely irrelevant.

    2. I addressed his 500 passing yards by pointing out stats that, IMO, paint a picture of two pretty even performances. I'll break the tie with the guy who was more clutch and won the game. You apparently think that is a very unreasonable position, which confuses me.

    3.
    Last edited by McCarthy12; 09-07-2020, 02:49 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • slag
    replied
    Originally posted by McCarthy12 View Post

    If you want to nitpick, they had the same number of completions, same number of turnovers and same number of passing TD's although Foles also caught a TD in one of the greatest plays in SB history. Oh yeah, Foles also WON THE GAME. I suppose Pats fans everywhere are taking solace in the fact that Brady threw for more yards. C'mon man!!!
    Come on what?

    It cracks me up when fans of a team get their briefs in a bunch over someone else not blindly sucking the hometown dick.

    If you had said that you don't give a fuck if Foles can't beat out Minchew or Trubisky because he won the Super Bowl for the Eagles ... fine ... neither do I.

    But suggesting that he "beat out" a guy with six total rings who threw for 500 yards in the same game, simply because the other guys' team lost that game, is horse shit and you know it.

    And my point has nothing to do with Pats fans taking solace either ... but I'm pretty sure you know that also.

    EDITED TO ADD: And if you think about it ... my statement about it being unfair to single out Brady as who Foles "beat out" in that game is actually a compliment to Foles.
    Last edited by slag; 09-07-2020, 01:11 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • McCarthy12
    replied
    Double post.
    Last edited by McCarthy12; 09-07-2020, 11:51 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • McCarthy12
    replied
    Originally posted by slag View Post

    Well ... he was certainly the quarterback for a Super Bowl winner against a team with Brady at QB ... and won't ever pay for a drink in a bar that I'm in ... but I'm not sure I'd say he "beat out" the guy who threw for over 500 yards in that Super Bowl.
    If you want to nitpick, they had the same number of completions, same number of turnovers and same number of passing TD's although Foles also caught a TD in one of the greatest plays in SB history. Oh yeah, Foles also WON THE GAME. I suppose Pats fans everywhere are taking solace in the fact that Brady threw for more yards. C'mon man!!!
    Last edited by McCarthy12; 09-07-2020, 11:47 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • DEERSPINE GUY
    replied
    Originally posted by slag View Post

    Well ... he was certainly the quarterback for a Super Bowl winner against a team with Brady at QB ... and won't ever pay for a drink in a bar that I'm in ... but I'm not sure I'd say he "beat out" the guy who threw for over 500 yards in that Super Bowl.
    FOLES HOLDING THAT TROPHY AND BRADY HOLDING HIS DICK MAKES HIM THE 'BEAT HIM OUT' IN HUMBLE OPINION.

    EDIT TO ADD: BUT I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM.
    Last edited by DEERSPINE GUY; 09-06-2020, 05:06 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • slag
    replied
    Originally posted by McCarthy12 View Post

    He beat out Tom Brady in the Super Bowl. That's all that matters.
    Well ... he was certainly the quarterback for a Super Bowl winner against a team with Brady at QB ... and won't ever pay for a drink in a bar that I'm in ... but I'm not sure I'd say he "beat out" the guy who threw for over 500 yards in that Super Bowl.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuTMSY4
    replied
    Originally posted by McCarthy12 View Post

    He beat out Tom Brady in the Super Bowl. That's all that matters.
    owned

    Leave a comment:


  • Spartan92
    replied
    Originally posted by McCarthy12 View Post

    He beat out Tom Brady in the Super Bowl. That's all that matters.
    That's for damn sure no doubt and love him for it forever!

    Leave a comment:


  • McCarthy12
    replied
    Originally posted by Spartan92 View Post
    Yikes!!!
    He beat out Tom Brady in the Super Bowl. That's all that matters.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spartan92
    replied
    Originally posted by thegodfather View Post
    Trubisky was always going to be the starter
    Ya, Mitch was one of the worst starting Qb's in the NFL last year. They traded for Foles for a conditional 4th and guaranteed him $21 million, I'm sure that was to be a back up their already shit starter lol "considering it was an open competition in camp"

    Edit to add: and they declined Mitch's 5th year option meaning he was never their long term solution thus bringing in Foles so not sure what our point is
    Last edited by Spartan92; 09-05-2020, 01:42 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X