Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Peter "Norm" King joins the ever growing group refusing to use the foreskins name

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Sure I do ... you're a shit stirring mosquito.

    I've swatted you enough.
    Obscenity is the last refuge of an inarticulate motherfucker.

    Comment


    • #47
      the name *IS* offensive

      maybe to gays like you. Not to real people.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Maniac View Post
        If the Redskins changed their name to the Warriors and left everything else the same, would it end the controversy?

        Some native Americans would simply prefer not to be used as team mascots in even a benign context considering their history with the European settlers.

        PS - Don't go down to the rez and start calling people Chief.
        If they changed their name to the Washington Warriors and kept everything else the same, the controversy would absolutely be over. Anyone still complaining wouldn't have any credibility. There's this thing called free speech that nullifies opposition to the use of words used in benign context. Also, don't go down to your local pub and start calling everyone Chief. The End.

        Comment


        • #49
          Blackhorse v. Pro Football Inc. ring a bell?

          Real people?

          Nah ... real racists works though.
          Obscenity is the last refuge of an inarticulate motherfucker.

          Comment


          • #50
            Your anti-gay schtick

            Originally posted by McNabbhater View Post
            the name *IS* offensive

            maybe to gays like you. Not to real people.
            is weak. Go away. That's at least two threads now where you're trying to turn it into something else.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Pete View Post
              is weak. Go away. That's at least two threads now where you're trying to turn it into something else.
              The Hammer must be sleeping.

              Comment


              • #52
                Seriously I dont see how Chiefs is so much more acceptable than Redskins. Yes, I agree that Redskins is more offensive but neither is appropriate. That was my original point. I don't see the why the Chiefs get a free pass. That was all. I was surprised by the defense of Chiefs.

                From what I've read, many native Americans don't give a shit. It's not a quality of life issue for them.
                Blue Chip College Football - Coach Your College to the National Championship

                Comment


                • #53
                  At least you didn't write

                  Originally posted by Maniac View Post
                  Seriously I dont see how Chiefs is so much more acceptable than Redskins. Yes, I agree that Redskins is more offensive but neither is appropriate. That was my original point. I don't see the why the Chiefs get a free pass. That was all. I was surprised by the defense of Chiefs.

                  From what I've read, many native Americans don't give a shit. It's not a quality of life issue for them.
                  some of your best friends are native Americans.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X