More Gun Nut Shenanigans: Man Kills Two Innocent Neighbors On Their Own Property

[FuriousXGeorge]

As semi-auto. Using that definition then assault rifles are even less of an issue

Correct, we have used effective gun control to make it so fully automatic weapons are extremely unlikely to be used in crimes or mass shootings in the United States. Whether we can or should do that for the so called "assault weapons" is an open debate.

[Melchior]

Correct, we have used effective gun control to make it so fully automatic weapons are extremely unlikely to be used in crimes or mass shootings in the United States. Whether we can or should do that for the so called "assault weapons" is an open debate.

My problem with that is, why ban those rifles when they're not really any more dangerous than any other semi-auto gun?

[FuriousXGeorge]

My problem with that is, why ban those rifles when they're not really any more dangerous than any other semi-auto gun?

A ban based on cosmetic rather than functional characteristics is definitely silly.

[Big Little]

Yes murder is always an insane crime of passion or loss of control.

Guns are the only way to "reach out and touch some one" the original post was about two men looking at the property they were going to build on, if that person didn't own a gun they would still be alive today.

I guess I will just never understand the gun lust in this country, it is NOT the Wild West any longer, nor is it 1776 when Militia were prevalent, all I am asking/saying/screaming for is some reform to make it harder for crazy mofo's to get weapons

[3rd & Inches]

5 times more people are killed with knives than with rifles - of all sorts (semi-auto or bolt action). hence the red herring status

10 times more people fall victim to my bare hands every year. My fists are registered in all the known territories. I'm a Fist Nut.

[Mississippi-Fan]

The shooter was a nut!

https://scontent-a-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/...43983363_n.jpg

[Eagle Road]

Yes murder is always an insane crime of passion or loss of control.

Guns are the only way to "reach out and touch some one" the original post was about two men looking at the property they were going to build on, if that person didn't own a gun they would still be alive today.

I guess I will just never understand the gun lust in this country, it is NOT the Wild West any longer, nor is it 1776 when Militia were prevalent, all I am asking/saying/screaming for is some reform to make it harder for crazy mofo's to get weapons

Big, I do understand what you are saying, but if you would, let's look at the retired COP that shot an unarmed man (unless you consider a bag of popcorn lethal), in a movie theater with his wife.

Here is a guy that supposedly spent his life's work in law enforcement, to "protect and serve" as it were.

By any stretch, of any sane persons imagination, with as rigid of a background and personal checks as you could come up with, do you really see any scenario that this guy doesn't get a gun permit?

He would probably be the golden boy of "allowed to carry" he is not some hotheaded kid, he has a clean record, he has served his community, he has years upon years of training and being tested on firearms.

But yet sadly, he WAS YOUR KILLER!

All I am saying is, I have no idea how you could ever could up with some foolproof way of weeding these people out.

[Melchior]

[/B]


Big, I do understand what you are saying, but if you would, let's look at the retired COP that shot an unarmed man (unless you consider a bag of popcorn lethal), in a movie theater with his wife.

Here is a guy that supposedly spent his life's work in law enforcement, to "protect and serve" as it were.

By any stretch, of any sane persons imagination, with as rigid of a background and personal checks as you could come up with, do you really see any scenario that this guy doesn't get a gun permit?

He would probably be the golden boy of "allowed to carry" he is not some hotheaded kid, he has a clean record, he has served his community, he has years upon years of training and being tested on firearms.

But yet sadly, he WAS YOUR KILLER!

All I am saying is, I have no idea how you could ever could up with some foolproof way of weeding these people out.

So because this particular person would've slipped through the cracks, any effort is useless? It doesn't have to be "foolproof." If it works in some instances, then that's a good thing, right?

[Mt Iggle]

I would always slow down to look at the wreck!

[Mississippi-Fan]

now i got it

[T.D-Bag]

https://scontent-a-ord.xx.fbcdn.net/...43983363_n.jpg

Hitler was speaking of the need to disarm non-Aryans in the parts of Russia that had been occupied by German forces in the midst of a war, not of stripping all Germans of their guns. (And it's unlikely that Hitler would have expressed such a concept in this context, as the 1938 German Weapons Act passed during Hitler's rule actually loosened gun ownership rules for non-Jewish Germans.)

[Mississippi-Fan]

Das ist nicht wahr.

Hitler was speaking of the need to disarm non-Aryans in the parts of Russia that had been occupied by German forces in the midst of a war, not of stripping all Germans of their guns. (And it's unlikely that Hitler would have expressed such a concept in this context, as the 1938 German Weapons Act passed during Hitler's rule actually loosened gun ownership rules for non-Jewish Germans.)

Wie wird das Datum dieser Meldung ist 1935, und es gilt nur für die deutsche Republik.