Sure, Why Not? And Fire Chip Kelly While You're At It
I must admit there were times when I thought the article started to make a little sense -- that's when I decided it was time to put the bottle of scotch back in the cupboard.
Trade Desean Jackson? I have two words in response -- "in" and "sane"!
Jackson might lose a step? Sure, and I might lose 150 pounds and get into a pair of size 36 waist pants for the first time since 1971!
Fact -- Jackson is coming off his best season. Fact -- every time he goes back as a punt returner you know the possibility is there he will take it to the house. The thing is, the other team knows this as well
IMHO, the most important part about that article is the way one wideout opens up the middle for the running game, and as the article also pointed out the Eagles' running game was just a little bit successful last season.
I'm not quite ready to jump on the "Chip walks on water" bandwagon just yet, but I'll trust his judgement and my eyes on this one.
I must admit there were times when I thought the article started to make a little sense -- that's when I decided it was time to put the bottle of scotch back in the cupboard.
Trade Desean Jackson? I have two words in response -- "in" and "sane"!
Jackson might lose a step? Sure, and I might lose 150 pounds and get into a pair of size 36 waist pants for the first time since 1971!
Fact -- Jackson is coming off his best season. Fact -- every time he goes back as a punt returner you know the possibility is there he will take it to the house. The thing is, the other team knows this as well
IMHO, the most important part about that article is the way one wideout opens up the middle for the running game, and as the article also pointed out the Eagles' running game was just a little bit successful last season.
I'm not quite ready to jump on the "Chip walks on water" bandwagon just yet, but I'll trust his judgement and my eyes on this one.
Comment