Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FO Speaks on Djax

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FO Speaks on Djax

    Kelly said releasing Jackson was "purely a football decision" and had nothing to do with an NJ.com report linking Jackson to gang members in California.

    Lurie backed Kelly's decision to release Jackson and said, "It was clear [to Chip] it was not a fit."

    "Chip and his people were incredibly clear that for us to get better, we needed to take a step back and re-configure the wide receiver position," Lurie said, according to the team's website.

    Lurie said he gives Kelly the "benefit of the doubt."

    "He knows what he wants and he knows how to get there," he said. "I really believe it's an organization that absolutely supports the direction we're going and that's the best way to be. Everyone is in it together, and I think Chip is always going to base things not just on statistics but how you're going to perform, and how you are going to perform in the playoffs."

    Kelly added that the Eagles tried to trade Jackson but decided to release him after they couldn't find a trade partner at the owners meetings in Orlando, Fla.

    "We were going in a different direction at the wide receiver position," Kelly said, according to the team's website. "We came back from the owners meetings and we had no takers from a trade standpoint, so we thought that it was best at that point and time to release him.

    "It has nothing to do with anything that was ever written in a newspaper or any off-field behavior from him."

    Kelly also denied that he had an issue with Jackson.

    "DeSean was great the year I was with him. We wish him nothing but the best in terms of where he's going to be. It's a decision that we made as a team that a lot of teams make at that point and time," Kelly said, comparing the move to the Buccaneers' release of cornerback Darrelle Revis, the Bears' release of defensive end Julius Peppers and the Cowboys' decision to part ways with linebacker DeMarcus Ware.
    http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/10...on-was-not-fit

    Sorry if already posted

  • #2
    Obviously smear.

    "DeSean was great the year I was with him."

    No mention of other years and his legacy as an Eagle? How arrogant for him to think that Eagles history begins with the Chip Kelly Area.
    --
    Your Retarded

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by TerpEagle View Post
      Obviously smear.

      "DeSean was great the year I was with him."

      No mention of other years and his legacy as an Eagle? How arrogant for him to think that Eagles history begins with the Chip Kelly Area.

      But how do you mention great year with him and then say he doesn't fit your system?
      500 internet fights, that's the number I figured when I first joined igglephans. 500 internet fights and you could consider yourself a legitimate internet-tough guy. You need them for experience, to develop leather skin. So I got started. Of course along the way you stop thinking about being tough and all that. It stops being the point. You get past the silliness of it all. But then...after...you realize that's what you are.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by 3rd & Inches View Post
        But how do you mention great year with him and then say he doesn't fit your system?


        Didn't fit the pocket book.

        Comment


        • #5
          Probably a financial move as well

          Originally posted by TerpEagle View Post
          Obviously smear.

          "DeSean was great the year I was with him."

          No mention of other years and his legacy as an Eagle? How arrogant for him to think that Eagles history begins with the Chip Kelly Area.
          Although they would never say that. The timing of it screams "time to draft a new guy and pay him rookie salary for 4-5 years"...or at least not pay a guy 10 mil per to be a regular season stud. Draft is filled with great receivers, made the decision that much easier. Sux he went to a division rival but to me that's a coach making a statement to his team that we are that good we can absorb a good player going to a division rival. It's a great system, that amazingly transitioned from college to pro in one year.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by 3rd & Inches View Post
            But how do you mention great year with him and then say he doesn't fit your system?
            i read it that he was talking about his attitude. So either he means it or he is just not saying anything because desean is already on another team and can't say anything.
            “I am going to literally sodomize you on the field of battle. I am going to have non-consensual sex with your face and your butt. Then I’m going after your wife and kid”

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by nerd View Post
              i read it that he was talking about his attitude. So either he means it or he is just not saying anything because desean is already on another team and can't say anything.

              Could be right. Well Chip better have a fucking plan.
              500 internet fights, that's the number I figured when I first joined igglephans. 500 internet fights and you could consider yourself a legitimate internet-tough guy. You need them for experience, to develop leather skin. So I got started. Of course along the way you stop thinking about being tough and all that. It stops being the point. You get past the silliness of it all. But then...after...you realize that's what you are.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by 3rd & Inches View Post
                But how do you mention great year with him and then say he doesn't fit your system?
                Just because Jackson had a great year in Kelly's offense doesn't mean that he can't be replaced by one or more options that would net significantly less money against the cap and (ifs rumor are true) possibly buy into Kelly's team culture more completely.

                That doesn't mean it's guaranteed to happen, but DeSean Jackson is not the be-all and end-all of wide receivers.
                --
                Your Retarded

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by TerpEagle View Post
                  Just because Jackson had a great year in Kelly's offense doesn't mean that he can't be replaced by one or more options that would net significantly less money against the cap and (ifs rumor are true) possibly buy into Kelly's team culture more completely.

                  That doesn't mean it's guaranteed to happen, but DeSean Jackson is not the be-all and end-all of wide receivers.




                  I agree, I also think that with Kelly you have a guy that good enough, is never good enough, I wouldn't be surprised at all if this team is constantly evolving.


                  Unlike Andy, I think Kelly would of had a lot more competitions in camp, I think Dmac and some others would have been pushed a lot harder under Kelly.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Eagle Road View Post
                    I agree, I also think that with Kelly you have a guy that good enough, is never good enough, I wouldn't be surprised at all if this team is constantly evolving.


                    Unlike Andy, I think Kelly would of had a lot more competitions in camp, I think Dmac and some others would have been pushed a lot harder under Kelly.
                    That's why I still don't think Kelly is as nearly sold on Foles yet as many of the fans are.
                    --
                    Your Retarded

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by TerpEagle View Post
                      That's why I still don't think Kelly is as nearly sold on Foles yet as many of the fans are.


                      Probably true, I think Kelly is a "what have you done for me lately" guy, think about it, after the numbers that Foles put up last year, most other coaches in this league would have said we have our QB for the next ten years, Kelly said " we will be bringing guys in for QB completion as soon as camp breaks.


                      No coddled soup men on this team.
                      Last edited by Eagle Road; 04-28-2014, 05:30 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        That's all it was.

                        Well, maybe a little "cultural" ... but money was the name of this game.

                        I said to my brother that this was a Revis type thing and Kelly confirmed that today.

                        Now, the Bucs went out and signed a Pro Bowl corner as a replacement ... the Eagles fucking better do something to replace Jackson.
                        Obscenity is the last refuge of an inarticulate motherfucker.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          What?

                          Sanchez is a backup.

                          This ain't college ... there's money involved here ... part of the Jackson move IMO was because they're going to have to commit financially to Foles if he continues to play like he did.
                          Obscenity is the last refuge of an inarticulate motherfucker.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            When you get rid of one of the top 2-3 offensive players and an all pro and call it a football decision, fans can only wonder what kind of a challenge the next coach will have restoring credibility of this franchise. We'll learn that in a year.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by weizer View Post
                              Although they would never say that. The timing of it screams "time to draft a new guy and pay him rookie salary for 4-5 years"...or at least not pay a guy 10 mil per to be a regular season stud. Draft is filled with great receivers, made the decision that much easier. Sux he went to a division rival but to me that's a coach making a statement to his team that we are that good we can absorb a good player going to a division rival. It's a great system, that amazingly transitioned from college to pro in one year.
                              Most any football move is a financial one when it comes down to it. What's the value added vs. the cost?
                              --
                              Your Retarded

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X