Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mark Sanchez business decision

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mark Sanchez business decision

    .

  • #2
    Originally posted by Dolomite View Post
    .



    For WHO? For WHAT?

    Comment


    • #3
      Hey, you could always have Barkley

      Originally posted by Eagle Road View Post
      For WHO? For WHAT?
      The guy who can barely throw it to the sidelines.
      "I feel much better now that my pants are on."- overheard conversation at a Gayte

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Raptor View Post
        The guy who can barely throw it to the sidelines.
        I'm usually not this down on Sanchez, but this game he has been a deer in the headlights, no wait, make that an Albino deer in the crosshairs.

        This is one of the best disciplined D's in the league, you aren't going to get anywhere by mulling around trying to make a decision.

        Comment


        • #5
          It's more than Sanchez

          Originally posted by Eagle Road View Post
          I'm usually not this down on Sanchez, but this game he has been a deer in the headlights, no wait, make that an Albino deer in the crosshairs.

          This is one of the best disciplined D's in the league, you aren't going to get anywhere by mulling around trying to make a decision.
          ....how many 3rd and longs were converted today vs our D, McCoys fumble, some shitty calls???
          "I feel much better now that my pants are on."- overheard conversation at a Gayte

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Raptor View Post
            ....how many 3rd and longs were converted today vs our D, McCoys fumble, some shitty calls???
            Absofuckinglutely, BUT you also can't expect the Eagles D to paly 50 fucking minutes either, a run here or there and an extra first down could have made a difference, that is ALL I am saying.

            Comment


            • #7
              The only way the D doesn't play 50 min's

              Originally posted by Eagle Road View Post
              Absofuckinglutely, BUT you also can't expect the Eagles D to paly 50 fucking minutes either, a run here or there and an extra first down could have made a difference, that is ALL I am saying.
              Is getting off the field, but I hear you, just disagree to lay this all at the back up QBs feet.

              Besides you have little choice, until Foles returns this is it. Barkley is not a viable option at this point.
              "I feel much better now that my pants are on."- overheard conversation at a Gayte

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Raptor View Post
                Is getting off the field, but I hear you, just disagree to lay this all at the back up QBs feet.

                Besides you have little choice, until Foles returns this is it. Barkley is not a viable option at this point.


                I understand, but here's the thing, I HONESTLY would have thought that Sanchez would/should have been the better option for this game.

                I just think a bit of QB scrambling would have helped. I'm not sure that against this D, that Foles long ball helps much, because the Eagles rec's REALLY didn't get much separation.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I agree a few QB runs

                  Originally posted by Eagle Road View Post
                  I understand, but here's the thing, I HONESTLY would have thought that Sanchez would/should have been the better option for this game.

                  I just think a bit of QB scrambling would have helped. I'm not sure that against this D, that Foles long ball helps much, because the Eagles rec's REALLY didn't get much separation.
                  With a little gimmick tossed in would be nice.
                  "I feel much better now that my pants are on."- overheard conversation at a Gayte

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    McCoy putting the loaf on the ground was a momentum killer. Instead of a chance of establishing an offensive flow for the 2nd half you immediately put your D under duress and in less than a minute you're down by ten.
                    Then after scoring to make it 3 points down and pinning them on the 9 on the KO, the D gives up 56 yards on two plays (Cole fails to hold edge and Fletcher again failing to turn to look at the ball).
                    Sanchez didn't do anything to win this game but you can't pin the loss entirely on him either.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Yep, You would be hard pressed to start

                      Originally posted by nor'easter View Post
                      McCoy putting the loaf on the ground was a momentum killer. Instead of a chance of establishing an offensive flow for the 2nd half you immediately put your D under duress and in less than a minute you're down by ten.
                      Then after scoring to make it 3 points down and pinning them on the 9 on the KO, the D gives up 56 yards on two plays (Cole fails to hold edge and Fletcher again failing to turn to look at the ball).
                      Sanchez didn't do anything to win this game but you can't pin the loss entirely on him either.
                      The second half in a worse way....a real kick in the crotch.
                      "I feel much better now that my pants are on."- overheard conversation at a Gayte

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by nor'easter View Post
                        McCoy putting the loaf on the ground was a momentum killer. Instead of a chance of establishing an offensive flow for the 2nd half you immediately put your D under duress and in less than a minute you're down by ten.
                        Then after scoring to make it 3 points down and pinning them on the 9 on the KO, the D gives up 56 yards on two plays (Cole fails to hold edge and Fletcher again failing to turn to look at the ball).
                        Sanchez didn't do anything to win this game but you can't pin the loss entirely on him either.




                        Can't entirely agree, Fletch looked at that ball, he swatted the damn thing away, if the rec, didn't have a hold of him it's an interception, I guess all I am saying is the refs really sucked it hard today.


                        In a game like this either call EVERYTHING(Seattle got away with murder) or put the fuckin flag in your sock and let them play.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Was Chip pissed at non-calls for grounding when Wilson was launching it into the crowd or was there something else? And the fact they missed #77 twenty yards downfield is inexcusable. They call the tick tack shit and miss the most obvious transgressions.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by nor'easter View Post
                            Was Chip pissed at non-calls for grounding when Wilson was launching it into the crowd or was there something else? And the fact they missed #77 twenty yards downfield is inexcusable. They call the tick tack shit and miss the most obvious transgressions.




                            Truth!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Raptor View Post
                              With a little gimmick tossed in would be nice.
                              I expected to see Sanchez run it a few times on the zone read. You trade a couple McCoy 3-yard runs for 5 yards and get down from Sanchez and they get a lot better on 3rd down.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X