So now they are saying the Brownstains offered #19 for Bradford.

[Greenstealth]

If Mariota is chips guy, I'm fine with it...

[slag]

What does the percentage of deep passes have to do with how well one or the other throws them?

[Riccardo]

I thought that was a Chip lie

Interesting.

http://www.phillymag.com/birds247/20...-for-bradford/

Diggles wrong again!

[nerd]

What does the percentage of deep passes have to do with how well one or the other throws them?

I dont know... maybe I should have said being willing to throw the long ball instead of saying how well.

[slag]

I don't think it was as much about willingness as the offense he was in and the personnel around him.

My understanding is that part of the reason Kelly was sour on Foles was that he was missing open guys on deep throws and that Bradford is better at it.

[nerd]

I don't think it was as much about willingness as the offense he was in and the personnell around him.

My understanding is that part of the reason Kelly was sour on Foles was that he was missing open guys on deep throws and that Bradford is better at it.

I don't have any numbers to back it up but I was pretty sure I read that bradford didn't excel at throwing the deep pass either.

I know that foles deep ball completion % in 2013 was 47% which put him in the top ten in that stat. I do not know what bradford was in the part of 2013 he played or prior seasons.

What I do know is that bradfords biggest attribute was his "manning-like accuracy" per scouting reports....but I don't know what the backups in st louis % was for attempting deep passes this year... which would be the only real comparison since its the same team with lack of personnel.

[WeflyHigh]

Bradford's percentage on deep throws is way skewed when you look at his receiver corps.

There is a YouTube vid of all of Bradford's throws over 15 yards and the accuracy is pretty apparent. But so is his sub par receivers. It's litteratly drop after drop.

Bradford could be a diamond in the rough.


Tebow on ther other hand is a pile of shit.

[slag]

If drops aren't removed from the equation, completion stats are bullshit.

[Joegrane]

Bradford's percentage on deep throws is way skewed when you look at his receiver corps.

There is a YouTube vid of all of Bradford's throws over 15 yards and the accuracy is pretty apparent. But so is his sub par receivers. It's litteratly drop after drop.

Bradford could be a diamond in the rough.

I agree. I especially like that Bradford had the most success when he worked with the current Eagles O coordinator.

I'd love to see the video if you have the link to the clip.

Tebow on ther other hand is a pile of shit.

I don't get the hate for Tebow.

We are talking about the #3 QB who will not likely play more than a few snaps per year.

Supposedly his mechanics have improved.

With the old mechanics his team made the playoffs and won a game.

Chip's system would certainly be a good fit for him.

He had success with Cooper in college.

They'd save some $ and maybe get a low round pick for Barkley.

Maybe they work a miracle and he develops into a serviceable #2 for little $.

This is barely a playoff contending team so who cares about the #3 QB.

[bobbyuk]

19 (875) and 20 (850) can get you to No.5 (1700). Throw in Bradford, who might be worth the equivlaent to a midround pick and that can get you to 4.

[Riccardo]

no one is reading that nonsense

STFU

[IronEagle]

19 (875) and 20 (850) can get you to No.5 (1700). Throw in Bradford, who might be worth the equivlaent to a midround pick and that can get you to 4.

You wouldn't have Bradford if you traded him for pick 19.

[Ellsworth]

Speaks volumes about this year's QB draft pool

[Greenstealth]

haha

You wouldn't have Bradford if you traded him for pick 19.

Wtf Bobby

[wynnron123]

19 (875) and 20 (850) can get you to No.5 (1700). Throw in Bradford, who might be worth the equivlaent to a midround pick and that can get you to 4.

Alcohol in the coffee this morning?