McLane makes the case for Bradford

[McCarthy12]

http://www.theolympian.com/sports/nf...e49815990.html

I think this is a little premature. But if he continues to play well (meaning the high 90's qb rating he has over the last 4 games, few turnovers etc.) and they win the division I think you try to sign him to a reasonable contract. Then try to get him some receivers that don't belong in the Special Olympics and fix the o line. I'm open to a better alternative, but who? And I think McLane has a point about having someone in the system for more than a year.

Of course, if he regresses and they don't win the division, I guess you start over again. 3 qb's in 4 years - we might as well be the Browns.

[Susquehanna Birder]

Funny how a couple games with Sanchez adjusts everybody's perception.

[BigSlizz]

My personal favorite is "get a third round pick" to start.

[CCPete]

That settles it for me. Let's lock him in to a 10 year contract now before he takes us to the Super Bowl and it costs a fortune to sign him.

[Big Little]

Give it a fucking rest already, man

[JB]

You're wasting your time and breath...

this hump lives for posts like this

[Riccardo]

Yeah I don't get why anyone responds to that ass clown with anything other than

CoCkaroachPenis

[JuTMSY4]

I've had him on block. I wish it wouldn't even show me when he posts - but I suppose that would make for some non sequiturs.

[Big Little]

CoCkaroachPenis

[DEERSPINE GUY]

JUST IGNORE THE JACKWEED IT WILL GO AWAY.

AS FOR BRADFORD HE HAS BEEN A PLEASANT SURPRISE. HOPEFULLY HE KEEPS THIS THING MOVING FORWARD. I WAS A,[ TRADE HIM FOR A SIX PACK, EVEN A WARM SIX OF IRON CITY BEER IS SOMETHING], BUT IF HE KEEPS IT ROLLING HOW CAN YA NOT SIGN HIM?