Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

so who is there at #8 for the Eags to grab?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • so who is there at #8 for the Eags to grab?

    Stanley?
    Goff?
    a CB?


    who do you cunts want?
    WANGNUTIAN. (pronounced wang-nooshan, martian)

  • #2
    I'd like Stanley or Elliott. It very well could be a QB.

    Comment


    • #3
      Elliots a stud, but you can get a good RB with one of our 3rd round picks.
      WANGNUTIAN. (pronounced wang-nooshan, martian)

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Ground_Meat View Post
        I'd like Stanley or Elliott. It very well could be a QB.
        Taking a RB at #8 is blasphemy.
        "If I was racist in my opinion of QB's, I wouldn't have a dog named Donovan." - downundermike

        Comment


        • #5
          It seems like a great spot for a BPA.
          -Slizz of Wangnutz

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Diggle View Post
            Stanley?
            Goff?
            a CB?


            who do you cunts want?
            BPA
            QB > OT > DB

            Depending on what's still around.
            "If I was racist in my opinion of QB's, I wouldn't have a dog named Donovan." - downundermike

            Comment


            • #7
              If Goff is there you take him or trade down for a boatload of picks. If not go BPA. Way to much of a reach for Lynch. Grab a QB later on.

              Comment


              • #8
                stanley

                Originally posted by Diggle View Post
                Stanley?
                Goff?
                a CB?


                who do you cunts want?
                stud tackle is the move here. Hargreaves isn't a bad fall back. I'd be surprised to see them both gone by 8.

                Also, trading back for picks isn't terrible.

                Comment


                • #9
                  It would seem odd to move up to 8 for a QB after having extended Bradford.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Stanley would fill biggest need. Maybe they (we) can move out of 8 while on clock if Stanley is gone and get more picks from a team desperate for Goff or a DL.

                    They will have better options draft day at 8 than 13, that's for sure.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Melchior View Post
                      Taking a RB at #8 is blasphemy.
                      I agree, but think he's special.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Agreed but Elliott seems like a really special talent. He might be worth taking at 8. RB one of weakest areas on team now on paper. I'd be fine with that pick.

                        Kid is a fucking stud.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Elliott is a great blocker and reliable in the passing game too, which is a trait the Andy Reid/Doug Pederson offense likes to exploit.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Don't get me wrong, I would have dumped Maxwell (and Roach) for anything but why wouldn't this team just tanked against the Giants and avoided all of this nonsense? Chip was gone. Is there any forward thinking going on with this circus of a front office? Geez.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Also, they better not even entertain the possibility of going with a RB in the first round.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X