Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sham Folded

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by slag View Post
    His teammates know its business and don't give a fuck ... why should we?

    ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED???

    I only support a holdout when when a player has clearly outperformed his contract.

    Bradford clearly has not outperformed his original contract or his two year renewal.
    --------
    "We choose to go to the moon."

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by JuTMSY4 View Post
      Like it is said here, Samantha was offered a 4 year deal. However, I can find nothing of Howie promising Bradskirt a long term deal by signing this one. Seems almost counter-intuitive right?
      You must not have seen this.

      http://www.csnphilly.com/football-ph...-got-lost-mail

      Like I said, he was never offered the contract. Try again.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by McCarthy12 View Post
        Oh, ok. It wasn't that they were drafting a qb it was that they were drafting a good qb he might have to compete with. Your logic would make sense with my 4 year old. Not with a professional. Certainly not with a professional with Bradford'so lack of accomplishments.
        Then you must not be too bright. When you give up assets to move up to select a QB, it would be pretty fuckin stupid to sign another QB to a long term deal. Even a 4 year old can figure that out.
        LOL

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by joe9518 View Post
          You must not have seen this.

          http://www.csnphilly.com/football-ph...-got-lost-mail

          Like I said, he was never offered the contract. Try again.
          Sham is lying
          --------
          "We choose to go to the moon."

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by CbEagle View Post
            Check out above, you are wrong.
            Sorry, check below, you are wrong

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Loki View Post
              and his agent turned it down. That's just public knowledge and a fact.
              I mean seriously, do you believe everything that the Philly media feeds you?

              check out the link I posted above.

              Comment


              • #37
                He didn't show up for a voluntary camp.

                This is a tempest in a teapot to me.
                Obscenity is the last refuge of an inarticulate motherfucker.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by IronEagle View Post
                  Sham is lying
                  LOL. Yeah because our media guys never lie to get ratings.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Bumford

                    Originally posted by joe9518 View Post
                    You must not have seen this.

                    http://www.csnphilly.com/football-ph...-got-lost-mail

                    Like I said, he was never offered the contract. Try again.
                    only answered the question of a "4-year, $72 million" deal with the "lost in the mail" joke.

                    If you are hanging your argument on that simple denial/brushoff comment, then you haven't listened to many agents or players or FO executives talk about potential deals before.

                    It's like saying that you don't believe Fletcher Cox was offered a multi-year deal with a $50 million+ bonus or that his agent isn't trying to reset the DT market just because the two of them said those statements aren't/weren't true.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by slag View Post
                      He didn't show up for a voluntary camp.

                      This is a tempest in a teapot to me.
                      Weakest holdout ever.

                      The sooner the Eagles move on from Bradford, the better as far as I am concerned.

                      He certainly is not the future of the Eagles.
                      --------
                      "We choose to go to the moon."

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by joe9518 View Post
                        LOL. Yeah because our media guys never lie to get ratings.
                        Bradford has stolen more money than any QB in history.
                        --------
                        "We choose to go to the moon."

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Pete View Post
                          only answered the question of a "4-year, $72 million" deal with the "lost in the mail" joke.

                          If you are hanging your argument on that simple denial/brushoff comment, then you haven't listened to many agents or players or FO executives talk about potential deals before.

                          It's like saying that you don't believe Fletcher Cox was offered a multi-year deal with a $50 million+ bonus or that his agent isn't trying to reset the DT market just because the two of them said those statements aren't/weren't true.
                          Again, zero proof he was offered that deal. Stop believing everything you read from our media. It is not about getting the facts, its about what gets ratings.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by joe9518 View Post
                            Again, zero proof he was offered that deal. Stop believing everything you read from our media. It is not about getting the facts, its about what gets ratings.
                            Oh the media! Sham Bradford is innocent!
                            --------
                            "We choose to go to the moon."

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Do you believe

                              Originally posted by joe9518 View Post
                              Again, zero proof he was offered that deal. Stop believing everything you read from our media. It is not about getting the facts, its about what gets ratings.
                              that Cox was not offered a $50+ million bonus deal because he or his agent said so?

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by IronEagle View Post
                                Bradford has stolen more money than any QB in history.
                                I don't care. Its not my money. teams can cut players anytime they want during the contract so I am suppose to feel sorry for the owners when a player holds out or gives a below average player more than he is worth?Contracts in the NFL aren't worth the paper they are written on.

                                You know what, players should do what is best for them, not the team. And all players know that and that is why the rest of the team will take Bradford back right now without any questions.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X