Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Carnage at ESPN

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by HEREisAKERS View Post
    I'd argue that LeBron James' THE DECISION set this is motion, as it was one of the first major, MAJOR non-event sports moments of the Twitter, Facebook reporter era that demonstrated how well hype and sensationalism would sell. When every moment is a reportable sports moment, no moment is a reportable sports moment and everything seems behind. People want to see the event and hear it from the players themselves.
    This article by Tom Ley lays it out well.



    It's more about the changing media landscape and the money that the networks have to spend to air actual sporting events.

    The side-show stuff was just done to keep them relevant for the hours they're not showing sports. It's a result more than a cause of what's happened.
    --
    Your Retarded

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by TerpEagle View Post
      This article by Tom Ley lays it out well.



      It's more about the changing media landscape and the money that the networks have to spend to air actual sporting events.

      The side-show stuff was just done to keep them relevant for the hours they're not showing sports. It's a result more than a cause of what's happened.
      I agree with his general take. ESPN overpaid for live sports content, and they got caught in a bad spot when people started cord cutting en-mass. MLB-TV and similar services certainly hurt them big time.

      Didn't former Eagles reporter Sheil Kapadia move to ESPN? I wonder if he was affected.He probably didn't have a large enough salary to be a major target.

      I never have cared for ESPN but a new complete PPV model could suck though. On a game by game basis I could accept it but subscriptions sort of have the same problem ESPN presents.
      --------
      "We choose to go to the moon."

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by IronEagle View Post
        I agree with his general take. ESPN overpaid for live sports content, and they got caught in a bad spot when people started cord cutting en-mass. MLB-TV and similar services certainly hurt them big time.

        Didn't former Eagles reporter Sheil Kapadia move to ESPN? I wonder if he was affected.He probably didn't have a large enough salary to be a major target.

        I never have cared for ESPN but a new complete PPV model could suck though. On a game by game basis I could accept it but subscriptions sort of have the same problem ESPN presents.
        It seemed like ESPN hired beat reporters for most NFL (and probably other leagues) teams. Obviously I don't know their finances but I doubt that is as expensive, especially if they're teams that generate a lot of pageviews.

        In general, media is moving away from the TV. I know cable news and SNL are having a good year due to politics, but if you look at the Trump-free era where Fox dominated, its demographic was skewed much older. As younger generations become the primary consumers I think it's going to get harder and harder for TV to be lucrative.

        I haven't really watched ESPN for something other than a live sporting event in over a decade. 30 for 30 is entertaining but they're on Netflix. I don't know if I mind a PPV model IF you can avoid packaging. Depending on the price, I'd be inclined to pay to watch a game or sign up for a team.
        Last edited by TerpEagle; 04-26-2017, 07:56 PM.
        --
        Your Retarded

        Comment


          #19
          Olbermann was funny...until he wasn't.

          Comment

          Working...
          X