THEY WANTED THE DRAFT PICK, HE WAS A THROW IN, THROWING OUT THE TRASH YOU MIGHT SAY. ACCORDING TO SBNATION.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
APPARENTLY BILLS WEREN'T INTERESTED IN JMATT AT ALL
Collapse
X
-
I read the article ... it wasn't about Matthews being a throw in, it was about why the 3 had to be thrown in with him.
EDITED TO ADD: And whether he gets a contract or not will be based on how he plays and what he is demanding as an free agent ... which right now all teams (including the Eagles) are wary about because his stats, despite the comparison to other playmakers, don't really support his reported playmaker demands.Last edited by slag; 08-13-2017, 10:15 AM.Obscenity is the last refuge of an inarticulate motherfucker.
Comment
-
I DON'T CARE ONE WAY OR THE OTHER LONG AS HE'S OUTTA HERE. http://https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.bleedinggreennation.com/platform/amp/2017/8/13/16140094/jordan-matthews-throw-in-eagles-bills-trade-contract-extension-philadelphia-ronald-darby-watkins&ved=0ahUKEwi-vY-Vs9TVAhVC7yYKHc3DCxoQqUMIXzAF&usg=AFQjCNGIgQtWJPSK aDvphB1OXc4WUVoCMg&cf=1"LIFE IS FULL OF 4TH AND 1 DECISIONS, CHOOSE YOUR NEXT CROSSROADS WISELY.
Comment
-
That's the one I read after your post.
It's business ... the Eagles had too many WR's and badly needed a DB ... they moved the WR in his walk year because they need a true #1, not a slot 2/3 with stats he can use to drive up his price ... particularly when Hollins looks as good as he does.
Meanwhile, the Bills moved the WR they didn't want ... took a DB back ... and then got a WR for the DB the Eagles wanted.
If I was the Bills, I wouldn't immediately look to sign Matthews off his misleading stats either ... but characterizing him as a throw in because he wasn't approached for a contract is just shit stirring by SB Nation IMO.Last edited by slag; 08-13-2017, 10:44 AM.Obscenity is the last refuge of an inarticulate motherfucker.
Comment
-
If he loved it here so Much he can come back
next season,,,I could see the Fagalor Mirage going poof and he would be fine in the slot,,Just think the Eagle do not want to pay the Guy like a Number one when he is clearly Not...Wonder what the deal was with Watkins?OFFICIAL BOARD DRUG CZAR
"BFTR"
Comment
-
Originally posted by slag View PostI read the article ... it wasn't about Matthews being a throw in, it was about why the 3 had to be thrown in with him.
EDITED TO ADD: And whether he gets a contract or not will be based on how he plays and what he is demanding as an free agent ... which right now all teams (including the Eagles) are wary about because his stats, despite the comparison to other playmakers, don't really support his reported playmaker demands.
Matthews will get a reasonable deal. Nobody's throwing huge dollars at him.Last edited by The Duck; 08-13-2017, 02:45 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by slag View PostThat's the one I read after your post.
It's business ... the Eagles had too many WR's and badly needed a DB ... they moved the WR in his walk year because they need a true #1, not a slot 2/3 with stats he can use to drive up his price ... particularly when Hollins looks as good as he does.
Meanwhile, the Bills moved the WR they didn't want ... took a DB back ... and then got a WR for the DB the Eagles wanted.
If I was the Bills, I wouldn't immediately look to sign Matthews off his misleading stats either ... but characterizing him as a throw in because he wasn't approached for a contract is just shit stirring by SB Nation IMO.
Comment
-
Yeah I agree with you.
Also nobody makes mention of this from Buffalo's perspective regarding the trades... but they have 2 1's, 2 2's and 2 3's next year. It is considered a great year for QB's with 3 projected to go top 3. I think it could be four by including Allen from Wyoming. At least 5 are suppose to go in the 1st round.
They are loaded up (and falling back in the standings ) to get a QB, IMO
Trust the Process is going on in Buffalo.
Comment
Comment