Speaking of lawyers...

[Dim Bulb]

Wondered what you barristers thought of Hurts' letter to the WFT. It strikes me as 60% PR (I'm a good guy looking after the public good) and 40% ensuring that he is on record for having taken prudent steps at the time of the incident to help the stricken and also is taking prudent steps to ensure that the WFT bears all the responsibility, not Hurts. It's basically a self serving letter that tries (probably unsuccessfully) to avoid being sued by the victims for some negligence claim that he somehow caused their damages by waving to the crowd or whatever. Palsgrafian.

[1960]

It’s PR value is obvious but I think your point of personal protection. Is spot on. In today’s world people (even fans) can sue for anything. Getting out in front of it is a smart idea. Of course his attorney could have quietly sent a letter but that is where the PR comes in.

[Kelly Pat]

There's at least one fan in hospital with multiple injuries. OK