Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wentz has a ring, Hurts does not

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Birdwatcher
    replied
    Or you could say, Hurts played in a SB and Wentz has not

    Leave a comment:


  • Harpoon
    replied
    Well, you're not wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • AgendaPolice
    replied
    Hurts Career Is Just Getting Started. Wentz Career Is Just About Over. They Both Deserve It. Let That Sink In For A Hot Second! ; )
    Last edited by AgendaPolice; 02-24-2023, 12:22 PM. Reason: Let That Sink In For A Hot Second! : p

    Leave a comment:


  • art vandelay
    replied
    I agree that Hurts deserves a ring. And I agree with DSG that he'll get one eventually.

    Leave a comment:


  • BirdBrawn
    replied
    I don't even have a collar.

    Leave a comment:


  • Two Gap Penetrator
    replied
    Originally posted by BirdBrawn View Post
    I don't have a ring either.
    You have ring around the collar.

    Leave a comment:


  • BirdBrawn
    replied
    I don't have a ring either.

    Leave a comment:


  • Harpoon
    replied
    Fucking Foles too!

    Leave a comment:


  • DEERSPINE GUY
    replied
    HURTS WILL GET HIS RING EVENTUALLY.
    JUST GOTTA SCORE 50 IN THE NEXT SUPER BOWL.
    CAUSE NO ONE CAN FIGURE OUT WHAT THE CHIEFS DO ON OFFENSE AND HOW TO STOP THEM.
    SENDING A MAN IN MOTION WAS THE TELL..IF HE GETS FOLLOWED IT WAS MAN ON MAN...IF NOT, IT WAS A ZONE DEFENSE......THAN THEY RUN THE PLAY ACCORDINGLY.

    IF ALL ELSE FAILS MAHOMES JUST RUNS WHEN IT BREAKS DOWN....
    CANT STOP THAT OFFENSE...



    Leave a comment:


  • Two Gap Penetrator
    replied
    The point is one deserves a ring the other does not. That’s all I’m saying. You can disagree. Up to you.

    Leave a comment:


  • art vandelay
    replied
    I thought the Super Bowl was fixed?

    I don't see what Wentz has to do with anything

    Leave a comment:


  • Phire Phat Phuck
    replied
    I think he is alluding to the two plays in the fourth when the Chiefs used that play that the Jaguars used against us that resulted in an open receiver just walking into the end zone. That was on our defense and especially Gannon. If we at least realized that they knew how to get us we would at least stopped them the second time. and possibly won the Superbowl. As far as it applies to Wentz, he did have a great run in 2017-2018 to get us into the playoffs before his season and ostensibly, career ending injury. In that sense he deserved a Superbowl ring more than Hurts. Or any of the 2022-23 Eagles. I blame Gannon for the loss. Note: After thinking about it, I think what I should have said was Wentz deserves a Superbowl ring as well as does Hurts. Wentz did make an impact and helped the Eagles until he was injured. Hurts did do more and it was not his fault alone that the Eagles lost. The whole thing is still very disappointing.
    Last edited by Phire Phat Phuck; 02-20-2023, 01:46 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • art vandelay
    replied
    Originally posted by Two Gap Penetrator View Post
    Let that sink in for a minute.
    I…don’t follow?

    Leave a comment:


  • 1960
    replied
    I guess Wentz was better covering wide open receivers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Two Gap Penetrator
    started a topic Wentz has a ring, Hurts does not

    Wentz has a ring, Hurts does not

    Let that sink in for a minute.
Working...
X