Would it really matter if Foles got hurt?

[slag]

Getting a tad extreme aren't we? ... Good trolling tho.

[Maniac]

Getting a tad extreme aren't we? ... Good trolling tho.

That's actually a "hot take" from ESP on the No-Huddle Podcast yesterday. If Foles plays like he did on Christmas, it's a fair question.

Bottom line, if you play Foles to get "in sync", you gotta play the O-line and the receivers too - which I would rather not do.

[slag]

what?

[Maniac]

what?

Sudfeld - or whatever his name is - wouldn't be worse that Foles.

ESP = Eliott Shorr-Parks, troll beat writer.

[Greenstealth]

Sudfeld - or whatever his name is - wouldn't be worse that Foles.

ESP = Eliott Shorr-Parks, troll beat writer.

Lol you listen to esp podcasts...

[slag]

So, you don't want to get Foles reps with the first team because of some podcast mental masterbation concluding that one bad performance by Foles means "or whatever his name is" can't be worse?

[Maniac]

So, you don't want to get Foles reps with the first team because of some podcast mental masterbation concluding that one bad performance by Foles means "or whatever his name is" can't be worse?

No, the "take" is that Foles should risk getting injured and play next week because Sudfeld couldn't be much worse than what we saw on Christmas. But I'd rather not risk the rest of the first team so no point in playing Foles either.

Foles has had more than one bad performance along the way. That was vintage Bambi. Not what anyone wants to see heading into the playoffs.

[Maniac]

Lol you listen to esp podcasts...

It's like picking a scab. You know you shouldn't but ...

[slag]

He's only played two games

EDITED TO ADD: And I don't know WTF you're suggesting with the rest of your answer.

Foles needs the reps ... with the first team ... and the nitwit notion that he's no better than a guy whose name of which you are unsure doesn't change any of that overriding necessity.