Tweet
...but can we keep him???
-
-
Not a chance. They're loaded wrh receivers. Nothing against Tate but money better spent elsewhere.Blue Chip College Football - Coach Your College to the National Championship -
Huh?Originally posted by Maniac View Post"If I was racist in my opinion of QB's, I wouldn't have a dog named Donovan." - downundermikeComment
-
I wouldn't pay Tate.. What confuses you?Originally posted by Melchior View PostBlue Chip College Football - Coach Your College to the National ChampionshipComment
-
-
I probably would. And I’d see if Matthews would stay for cheap.-Slizz of WangnutzComment
-
If price is right I definitely want him back. He’s a rock solid player. Great YAC. Physical. Like his mentality out there.
Reminds me of Hines Ward. He’s just a football player. Need as many of those as you can afford.Last edited by Ellsworth; 12-04-2018, 08:01 AM.Comment
-
That’s a very good comparison.-Slizz of WangnutzComment
-
We need a speed guy for next year.Comment
-
I think it'll come down to either him or AgholorYOU KILLED TED YOU MEDIEVAL DICKWEED!Comment
-
The part about them being loaded with receivers.Originally posted by Maniac View Post"If I was racist in my opinion of QB's, I wouldn't have a dog named Donovan." - downundermikeComment
-
Matthews will stay as long as they let him.
We just have a logjam with guys who aren't burners. Tate is better than Agholor, but it's hard to justify keeping two slot receivers. Agholor isn't good enough on the outside. If I had to guess, i'd say they let Tate walk, sign Nelson to a team-friendly deal, and go after a field stretcher in the offseason.
It wouldn't hurt my feelings if they kept Tate instead of Agholor but I don't see it happening.Comment
Comment