Chip Rearranges Locker Room!

[slag]

Thanks so much.

We had no idea rearranging the locker room wasn't that a big a deal.

We thought it was the key to winning.

Without your insight none of us rubes would have known winning is more a function of the quality of the players than the location of lockers.

[slag]

PS - Ok, no snide sarcasm.

Do you seriously think anyone here, and more particularly PackWest, thinks locker location is more important than players?

Or that Chip Kelly does?

Or that Chip Kelly is only doing that to dupe some "rubes"?

Or is it more likely that he merely thinks it's a small part of putting his stamp on the team and changing the stink from the recent past?

And that you're making a mountain out of a molehill.

[BigSlizz]

Maniac = ratings. He's got you going all Kelly Green.

[wynnron123]

PS - Ok, no snide sarcasm.

Do you seriously think anyone here, and more particularly PackWest, thinks locker location is more important than players?

Or that Chip Kelly does?

Or that Chip Kelly is only doing that to dupe some "rubes"?

Or is it more likely that he merely thinks it's a small part of putting his stamp on the team and changing the stink from the recent past?

And that you're making a mountain out of a molehill.

I agree with this post.

It's time to change every stinking thing about this team even if it's changing those shitty midnight green uniforms. Too much of FF stamp is left on this team that Kelly is trying to get rid of.

[PackWest]

You can order the locker room anyway you want.

Why thank you for acknowledging that

For a moment there I thought that your ego was superseding your frontal lobe on this particular topic

[Maniac]

And that you're making a mountain out of a molehill.

1. I didnt make a mountain out of a molehill. I posted a link to a story that got some national play with a brief comment and Chip Kelly's Rescue Rangers went apeshit.

2. Chip Kelly says the locker placement matters. Are you calling him a liar? Do you really think thats a meaningful way of "changing the culture"?

3. Why is it legit to question Castilleo and Geno Smith among others but not Chip Kelly?

[slag]

I feel like banging my head on a wall some more this fine morning.

1. Yes you did ... as a continuing campaign of making mountains out of molehills while attempting to portray Kelly as a clueless NFL neophyte who can coach boys but not men.

And you then insult anyone who's calling you on it as naive.

2. Strawmaaaaaan.

3. I watched Castilleo jump around like a doofus and headbutt people after being put into a position for which he had no pedigree.

Kelly isn't doing any of that.

In fact, Kelly is a highly successful head coach of a major college program who's advice has been sought by top NFL coaches.

Question it all you want ... just don't expect me to wring my hands about molehills with you ... in fact, expect me to continue to ridicule.

[TerpEagle]

1. I didnt make a mountain out of a molehill. I posted a link to a story that got some national play with a brief comment and Chip Kelly's Rescue Rangers went apeshit.

It's the combination of your brief comment of not caring combined with your post regarding the team you don't care about this year and your history of "not caring" but bitching.

2. Chip Kelly says the locker placement matters. Are you calling him a liar? Do you really think thats a meaningful way of "changing the culture"?

Do you think it's a meaningful way? If you do, what's your problem with the move - the culture sucked last year.

If you don't, why do you give a shit and even mention it since it's meaningless anyway and you have little anticipation as it is?

3. Why is it legit to question Castilleo and Geno Smith among others but not Chip Kelly?

The Castillo move was questioned because Reid made it after other moves failed and a postion coach on one side of the ball was being moved to the other - something that is rare and smelled of desperation/unpreparedness.

All players are scrutinized - just like all coaches. The difference is that you're questioning stupid shit.

There are plenty of people, myself included, that are skeptical that he'll succeed. That can be said for any new coach on any team (unless you're a 'Skins fan). But you are not being skeptical, you're complaining about things with pretty much no evidence.

The offense is a gimmick. Really? Have you seen them practice?

He's treating them like college kids. Really, because the locker room isn't organized the same way that Reid had it?

The defensive line coach is an assistant head coach, the organizational control is poor. Really, just like New England and a number of other NFL teams?

The only strong criticism of the hire and/or skepticism I see of him right now is that his NFL experience is limited. That's a valid concern. However, he has had incredible success in college and recently successful college coaches have done well in the NFL.

But, it's only a concern and it's been acknowledged by most people. Other than that, there's pretty much nothing to go on to say he's a good hire or not. The sheer questions regarding personnel will probably make that decision hard for a couple of years - because you know - talent is what really matters.

[Maniac]

The only strong criticism of the hire and/or skepticism I see of him right now is that his NFL experience is limited.

Limited is Rescue Ranger spin. His NFL experience is nonexistent.

You must really love him to write an essay like that. You were probably Gerry Faust fan too.

[slag]

As opposed to a Ray Handley or Marion Campbell fan?

[Ellsworth]

Rich Kotite is my kind of guy.

Streaked playchart and all. He was a man's man and the inspiration for those Jameson commercials.

[wynnron123]

This is the guy I wanted from the begining

[TerpEagle]

Limited is Rescue Ranger spin. His NFL experience is nonexistent.

You must really love him to write an essay like that. You were probably Gerry Faust fan too.

You must really be a Chip Kelly hater given all that you've written about him.

I told you I'm skeptical. I'd be skeptical whomever they hired because the odds are that he's going to fail. More coaches fail to win a championship than win one, so my expectations are tempered. I'm not going to make claims of his brilliance or stupidity until there is actual evidence to support either decision.

You've chosen a different route which is to pick your prophesy and fulfill it however you want. If that makes me a Chip Kelly lover in your mind then I guess you've just further shown your agenda and line of thinking.

Must be hard to comment and so much and anticipate so little.

[RSE]

My main concern about Chip Kelly is that every time -- every single damn time -- that Oregon got hit in the mouth by a team, be it Stanford or Alabama, Oregon folded like a cheap suit. Let's face it, our biggest freaking gripe about Andy Reid is that he couldn't make adjustment on the fly on Sundays. Can Chip Kelly?

[wynnron123]

My main concern about Chip Kelly is that every time -- every single damn time -- that Oregon got hit in the mouth by a team, be it Stanford or Alabama, Oregon folded like a cheap suit. Let's face it, our biggest freaking gripe about Andy Reid is that he couldn't make adjustment on the fly on Sundays. Can Chip Kelly?

Also the LSU game I attended when Oregon got bitch slapped. Hopefully this new DC bring some toughness to the D side, because Chip remind a little like FF and that finesse shit.