After sleeping on it a couple of days I guess I have to concede that maybe Lane Johnson was a good pick.
I can not praise him like he's the best thing since sliced bread the way many of the rest of youse guys have. He's a work in progress -- he's only been a tackle for two years, but if he's this good now, how good will he be in a few years when he knows what he's doing (sorry, I still gotta be me)?
As for Zach Ertz, for IronLousewort's information I really like him for two reasons. One, he's 6-5, 249 and Kelly calls him "a matchup nightmare" for many D-backs, even in the NFL. The second reason is that he can split wide and doesn't look out of place, and that fulfills my desire for a TALL "wideout" to target in the red zone. He won't kill you with speed, but if he can go up and catch the ball 15 or 20 yards down field he's still going to make this a better offense.
Here endeth the lesson.
I can not praise him like he's the best thing since sliced bread the way many of the rest of youse guys have. He's a work in progress -- he's only been a tackle for two years, but if he's this good now, how good will he be in a few years when he knows what he's doing (sorry, I still gotta be me)?
As for Zach Ertz, for IronLousewort's information I really like him for two reasons. One, he's 6-5, 249 and Kelly calls him "a matchup nightmare" for many D-backs, even in the NFL. The second reason is that he can split wide and doesn't look out of place, and that fulfills my desire for a TALL "wideout" to target in the red zone. He won't kill you with speed, but if he can go up and catch the ball 15 or 20 yards down field he's still going to make this a better offense.
Here endeth the lesson.
Comment