You've got:
1. An overextended underachieving youngster who's best claim to the spot is that he wasn't responsible for drafts that were marginally more horrible than the draft he was responsible for.
2. An apparent nerd who uses statistics and finishing orders in his latest game of Dungeons and Dragons to determine which players are worthwhile.
3. A legacy who disavows any use of statistics and looked good only when reflecting a real GM when he was the assistant and who apparently is too full of himself to ask his ex boss for help.
4. A guy who's playing career was characterized by toughness but not necessarily braininess, who the owner seems to like for reasons unknown.
That's your collective group of GMs.
1. An overextended underachieving youngster who's best claim to the spot is that he wasn't responsible for drafts that were marginally more horrible than the draft he was responsible for.
2. An apparent nerd who uses statistics and finishing orders in his latest game of Dungeons and Dragons to determine which players are worthwhile.
3. A legacy who disavows any use of statistics and looked good only when reflecting a real GM when he was the assistant and who apparently is too full of himself to ask his ex boss for help.
4. A guy who's playing career was characterized by toughness but not necessarily braininess, who the owner seems to like for reasons unknown.
That's your collective group of GMs.
Comment