Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
OT : Good thing "law abiding citizens" get to carry their guns around
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Riccardo View PostPreviously law-abiding gun carriers committing gun violence crimes happens once in a blue moonBlue Chip College Football - Coach Your College to the National Championship
Comment
-
What in the world are you talking about ? What agenda ?
Originally posted by Riccardo View PostAnd I was "joking" with the original poster, not the facts of the case. Why is this such a tragedy, when other homicides are not? Why didn't eagle in ohio post these homicides? They don't count? Or they don't fit the agenda...
http://projects.latimes.com/homicide/blog/page/1/
EDIT : I have ALWAYS stated that I am not anti-gun, however, I don't see any logical reason that Joe Blow from down the block should be able to have an AK-47, or any other high powered assault weapon that should really be reserved for the police or military. The only real purpose for a gun like that is to kill a lot of people in a little bit of time. I know it, and so do you.Last edited by Eagle In Ohio; 01-15-2014, 11:41 AM.The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is - Winston Churchill
Comment
-
Nope you misunderstood
Originally posted by Maniac View PostThats delusional. Most incidents of gun violence are committed by previously law abiding people. I'd bet you could find one most every day."I could buy you." - The Village Idiot
Comment
-
Seemed from the title of your post that your agenda
Originally posted by Eagle In Ohio View PostI didn't post those, because they weren't front page news for CNN. I don't go around looking for homicide stories, this one was front and center. Also, being that I'm a resident of Ohio, I don't normally find myself reading the friggin LA Times to see what's going on out there. I'll leave that to our West Coast correspondent, 3rd and Inches. This is Florida, a state where people are allowed to kill other people if they feel the slightest threat, and how much money do you want to bet that this man will invoke that dumb ass "stand your ground" rule to try and skate on murdering someone who hit him with popcorn ? Agenda. Child, please......
EDIT : I have ALWAYS stated that I am not anti-gun, however, I don't see any logical reason that Joe Blow from down the block should be able to have an AK-47, or any other high powered assault weapon that should really be reserved for the police or military. The only real purpose for a gun like that is to kill a lot of people in a little bit of time. I know it, and so do you."I could buy you." - The Village Idiot
Comment
-
George Zimmerman
Originally posted by Riccardo View PostWas against concealed carry permit gun owners. Anti-gun nuts like to use these rare occurances as evidence that they are a major problem, when in fact knives are exponentially more responsible for homicides than concealed carry permit guns. Regarding this case the guy might try to use a stand-your-ground defense but don't be ridiculous, this nut is not getting off.The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is - Winston Churchill
Comment
-
One person has a gun
Originally posted by Riccardo View PostVery little in common with this case.
One person felt "threatened"
The person who felt threatened is ironically the one who has the gun.
Both people who have guns shoot and kill the person who is unarmed.
there are only two differences. One murder victim was young and Black, the other was young and White. One victim had popcorn, the other had Skittles and tea.
Everything else is the same.The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is - Winston Churchill
Comment
-
Originally posted by Riccardo View PostPreviously law-abiding gun carriers committing gun violence crimes happens once in a blue moon - it isn't the problem. Criminals illegally carrying guns commit gun violence crimes every day - but anti-gun nuts don't seem to care about them.
The gun side is right on the legal arguments there, but it's purely retarded douchebaggery to suggest anti-gun folks haven't tried.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eagle In Ohio View PostThe other does not.
One person felt "threatened"
The person who felt threatened is ironically the one who has the gun.
Both people who have guns shoot and kill the person who is unarmed.
there are only two differences. One murder victim was young and Black, the other was young and White. One victim had popcorn, the other had Skittles and tea.
Everything else is the same.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SCREAMIN EAGLE View PostOne victim didn't bash the shooters head onto a concrete sidewalk before he got shot.
Comment
-
Exactly, what a ridiculous argument
Originally posted by FuriousXGeorge View PostRemember folks, if an armed stranger is following your kid in their car at night and then gets out of it to chase after them, make sure your kid knows never, ever to resist them.The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is - Winston Churchill
Comment
-
I'm shocked that you have single-handedly
Originally posted by Eagle In Ohio View PostA kid is walking through the neighborhood, minding his own business, not attempting to commit any crimes or anything like that, and some yahoo that wants to be a cop starts following him, based on nothing else than the clothes he was wearing. The man thinks the situation is dangerous enough to call 911, but instead of letting THEM handle it, he approaches the kid, never identifies himself as the neighborhood watch captain, and starts asking all sorts of questions. I'm sure if Screamin came across someone he didn't know while walking in a particular neighborhood, and that person started asking all kinds of questions as to why Screamin was there, he'd willingly comply and answer every question thoroughly. Zimmerman stays in his car like he was instructed to, and no one gets murdered. Period.Last edited by Greenstealth; 01-15-2014, 03:22 PM.
Comment
Comment