I saw a few of Riccardo's performances. The donkeys usually handed a few pesos with their mouths to Riccardo in the beginning... but with all of the laughter, it may have been staged.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dallass sportscaster has a shocking reaction to Sam announcing he's gay
Collapse
X
-
JESUS (pun intended)
The only fucking complication here is you trying to distinguish respect for a civil right by an idiotic reference to choice versus genetics.
Choice is irrelevant to respect for a civil right.
Enough already.Obscenity is the last refuge of an inarticulate motherfucker.
Comment
-
How can it still be look upon as courageous?
Originally posted by harls View PostSexuality should not.define us you are correct. But as long as sexuality determines what rights you have. As long as we as a nation treat homosexuals as second class citizens it
Will be lookedat ascuragious when someone risks safety and financial security to pave the wY towards acceptance for others.
There is no "buts" just an understanding of what it is like to be discriminated against as a child and later in life because of my disability. Sams enjoyed a great education and was going to be at worst a 5th round pick and have an average career in the NFL.
Gay Rights and the taboo's associated with it are not going to change because he came out, that is all I am saying.
Comment
-
Originally posted by slag View PostJESUS (pun intended)
The only fucking complication here is you trying to distinguish respect for a civil right by an idiotic reference to choice versus genetics.
Choice is irrelevant to respect for a civil right.
Enough already.
Civil rights with regard to race and sex are afforded based on birth without choice. You can't question someone's race or sex. There is nothing to question - it's an inherent trait. You can't discriminate based on race or sex. Sexual orientation falls in line with this set of rights. There is nothing to disagree with.
That is, of course, unless one's chosen religion, politics or set of values say he/she can disagree with someone's lack of choice in those traits. That's how slavery and oppression of women was and continues to be justified. Oppression of a non-choice is nothing like questioning someone's religious belief. Not even close.
And, STILL, this is a false comparison. Because Tebow was mocked for his football play - the religion aspect is simply a sideshow that allowed the mockery to bloom because it increased his popularity/infamy.--
Your Retarded
Comment
-
Originally posted by Neumans own View PostSams seems to be a smart young man, Homosexuality IMO is not a choice and I am not smart enough to understand the science behind genetics or environment behind what makes a person choose their sexuality any more so then I love "curvy redheads".
There is no "buts" just an understanding of what it is like to be discriminated against as a child and later in life because of my disability. Sams enjoyed a great education and was going to be at worst a 5th round pick and have an average career in the NFL.
Gay Rights and the taboo's associated with it are not going to change because he came out, that is all I am saying.
The best outcome of all of this would be a "ho-hum" reaction because it would mean that for most people it's no big deal. But immediately after he came out publicly, there was blow back of how he'll be a distraction, his draft stock will fall, what do players think, etc. That alone says that it's a big moment.--
Your Retarded
Comment
-
you make a good point with Miami and the hazing...
Originally posted by Dan Drives a Van View PostAnyone who opens themselves to public perception engages in 'marketing.' To this point, any "Gay" NFL players (not sure why the need for quotations) have felt compelled to 'market' themselves as straight. Now we've got a guy who is finally willing to 'market' himself as gay. It is a big deal because he's doing what others haven't had the courage to do thus far.
I think the recent peeks into the locker-room culture in Miami and Minnesota (the Chris Kluwe fiasco) validates Sam's desire to be open and public in order to allow clubs who'd rather avoid a very touchy subject do so with eyes open.
He's not Jackie Robinson, but he is someone who is going to make life easier for others in the future. Call it self-promotion if you want, but the NFL is all about self-promotion, and his brand of self-promotion is providing a version of role model that is completely lacking in the modern NFL. Christian kids who want to play football have lots of examples to look up to. Gay kids who want to play football do not.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TerpEagle View PostCivil rights with regard to race and sex are afforded based on birth without choice. You can't question someone's race or sex. There is nothing to question - it's an inherent trait. You can't discriminate based on race or sex. Sexual orientation falls in line with this set of rights. There is nothing to disagree with.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Neumans own View PostSams seems to be a smart young man, Homosexuality IMO is not a choice and I am not smart enough to understand the science behind genetics or environment behind what makes a person choose their sexuality any more so then I love "curvy redheads".
There is no "buts" just an understanding of what it is like to be discriminated against as a child and later in life because of my disability. Sams enjoyed a great education and was going to be at worst a 5th round pick and have an average career in the NFL.
Gay Rights and the taboo's associated with it are not going to change because he came out, that is all I am saying.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Riccardo View Post
K.
Comment
-
Originally posted by slag View PostShow me where I remotely suggested he isn't tolerant of anything.
EDITED TO ADD: Nice strawman though.
"On the other hand, it's pretty clear that you feel tolerance of sexual preference is more important than tolerance of religious belief."
Isn't this comparison intended to denigrate his tolerance of religious beliefs? Linguistically doesn't any comparison of this kind inherently ascribe lesser value to one belief over the other?
I don't care mind you, one way or the other. It just seems like you are not owning up to what appears to be the comparison you are making. Just keeping it real in a real way with reality and justice for all.DB
Comment
-
Good point
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/03/...ow-a-bad-idea/
MSNBC mocked him too, but you make a good point - neither of these outlets are the media either..."I could buy you." - The Village Idiot
Comment
Comment