Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

It doesn't help that

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Maniac
    replied
    Originally posted by Ground_Meat View Post
    I see a bright future for Matthews. I don't know what's not to like for a rookie WR...
    Could go either way. Love his size but I'm not sold on his hands.

    Huff looks like an Oregon charity case.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ground_Meat
    replied
    Originally posted by 91EaglesD View Post
    I have to admit, I was very high on both Matthews and Huff.


    Matthews is showing some LJ Smith "YAC" tendencies and Huff has been awful.


    Maclin is certainly playing the best ball of his career, but Riley should be a special teamer and 4th WR.
    I see a bright future for Matthews. I don't know what's not to like for a rookie WR...

    Leave a comment:


  • 91EaglesD
    replied
    Definitely not. You're the ultimate board alpha. You'll beat down any dead horse

    Leave a comment:


  • slag
    replied
    Don't hate because I'm not beta.

    Leave a comment:


  • 91EaglesD
    replied
    Yes, now I know what grinds your gears. Have a little chuckle at the fact that you're always talking the "over" with respect to how much time we give players, that's all counsel

    Leave a comment:


  • slag
    replied
    Like telling me I have to have 10 years of play to make a decision?

    Leave a comment:


  • 91EaglesD
    replied
    Take it easy there fella. I'm not writing him off I'm merely saying he hasn't progressed to where I would have hoped. Stop putting words in my mouth. I won't give him a slag worthy grade until he plays out his rookie contract

    Leave a comment:


  • slag
    replied
    Are you serious?

    They guy is a third round rookie receiver and is seeing more time every game.

    He's the starter on kick return.

    This shit is unbelievable.

    Every play has to work ... every player has to be an immediate starter or pro bowl player.

    Give me a fucking break.

    Leave a comment:


  • 91EaglesD
    replied
    Come on man I don't want to go around in circles. I made my point pretty clear earlier. He is clearly behind in chips eyes or he would see field more

    Leave a comment:


  • slag
    replied
    Ok ... he was a scratch for one game.

    So what?

    Leave a comment:


  • 91EaglesD
    replied
    And here's your link before you ask, knowing you well..

    Leave a comment:


  • 91EaglesD
    replied
    No he wasn't. Was a healthy scratch for rams game and was even featured in articles saying he wasn't sure why he wasn't playing.

    You're not always right you know. And that's ok

    Leave a comment:


  • slag
    replied
    What?

    He was in the first game they played after he got back on the practice field.

    Leave a comment:


  • 91EaglesD
    replied
    Originally posted by slag View Post
    Huff's played 2 games.
    I know I know Slag, we need a body of 10 years before we can pass judgement on ANY player.


    That's part of the problem, Huff can't get on the field. Got hurt then when he recovered, clearly Chip did not think he did enough to work into the rotation.

    Leave a comment:


  • slag
    replied
    Yeah ... but Rutgers was involved.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X