Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who cares if the Eagles "overpay?"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Who cares if the Eagles "overpay?"

    It's not money out of my wallet. IMO, it should only enter the discussion if paying one guy prevents you from signing other people (for example, Shady's salary became relevant assuming they plan to use that $ for other needs). All that matters is whether they are good. If Maxwell, Maclin, whoever, play well, who cares how much money they are making?

    The Nnamdi and DRC signings weren't bad because they paid too much, they were bad because they sucked at playing football. If Maxwell plays well I won't care if they paid him a few million more than the "should have." Conversely, if he sucks, I'm not going to be mad that they paid him $60 million; I'm going to be mad that they paid him $1 and thought he could play.

    I don't know, I never get wrapped up in the contract stuff.
    Last edited by McCarthy12; 03-08-2015, 03:16 PM.
    "Listen to McCarthy" - Art Vandelay

  • #2
    Level of agreement 1000%

    Originally posted by McCarthy12 View Post
    It's not money out of my wallet. IMO, it should only enter the discussion if paying one guy prevents you from signing other people (for example, Shady's salary became relevant assuming they plan to use that $ for other needs). All that matters is whether they are good. If Maxwell, Maclin, whoever, play well, who cares how much money they are making?

    The Nnamdi and DRC signings weren't bad because they paid too much, they were bad because they sucked at playing football. If Maxwell plays well I won't care if they paid him a few million more than the "should have." Conversely, if he sucks, I'm not going to be mad that they paid him $60 million; I'm going to be mad that they paid him $1 and thought he could play.

    I don't know, I never get wrapped up in the contract stuff.
    Not sure why people are freaking out (not so much here) about the fact that Maxwell is getting paid 8 versus 9 versus 10 million.

    However, the logical extension (based on what you wrote) is that if Maclin (or McCourty) sign elsewhere for what is perceived to be $1 million more than what the Eagles were alleged to be offering, then it's clearly because of the Maxwell deal. In some fans' minds...

    Comment


    • #3
      I suppose, theoretically, if we were trying to sign all three and could only sign two because of the salaries of the two we signed, then maybe it is an issue. However, in that scenario we probably couldn't afford to sign all three anyway and the real question is did we sign the right two.

      In reality though, they have a ton of cash and can probably sign all 3, right? There's a cap so obviously money, at some point, becomes an issue. But complaining that an individual contract is 35 cents more than it should be is silly, and, in most cases, irrelevant in the big picture.
      "Listen to McCarthy" - Art Vandelay

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by McCarthy12 View Post
        I suppose, theoretically, if we were trying to sign all three and could only sign two because of the salaries of the two we signed, then maybe it is an issue. However, in that scenario we probably couldn't afford to sign all three anyway and the real question is did we sign the right two.

        In reality though, they have a ton of cash and can probably sign all 3, right? There's a cap so obviously money, at some point, becomes an issue. But complaining that an individual contract is 35 cents more than it should be is silly, and, in most cases, irrelevant in the big picture.
        I get so sick of the cap experts on here. Almost as much as the draft experts
        I'm not the hill you want to die on

        Comment


        • #5
          Agreed. I would prefer to overpay for a guy who can possibly deliver than to pay perceived market value for a guy who is mediocre.

          Only problem is we don't know if Maxwell can deliver.

          Basically it equates to taking on risk.
          --------
          "We choose to go to the moon."

          Comment


          • #6
            Agreed. Some people just love to be outraged. The fact is the Eagles (with Maxwell and Alonso) are better now than they were a few days ago (with McCoy).

            Comment


            • #7
              P.S. All you need to know about this is summarized in the post by "PSU".

              Gotta love his track record in prognostication.
              --------
              "We choose to go to the moon."

              Comment


              • #8
                The problem with the 2011 FA signing spree was the FAs that they signed, not the idea of paying good players. You have to be shrewd when you have opportunities to upgrade in FA. As long as you know what you're looking for, you can improve your team quite a bit by smartly poaching players from cap-strapped teams as they become available.
                "If I was racist in my opinion of QB's, I wouldn't have a dog named Donovan." - downundermike

                Comment


                • #9
                  I care.

                  If he's paid like a a difference maker, then he needs to be a difference maker. Otherwise, the money could have been spent elsewhere or moved forward to next year for a player. You don't want to be in cap hell and mediocre like New Orleans right now.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X