Get him a running game that can move the chains. Hmmm. I'm starting to see a method to the madness.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How do you protect a young, rookie QB?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Two Gap Penetrator View Post....to be with Chip Kelly. Don't for a second dismiss the Commissioner McMahon Effect. This league knows how to make money.
IF they do trade for MM, it won't involve trading Bradford. The intention may be for MM to sit behind Bradford and then possibly take his job next year if Bradford gets too expensive.
Everyone assumes Mariota will step right in and start, but I don't think Chip is going to start a rookie QB unless he has to."If I was racist in my opinion of QB's, I wouldn't have a dog named Donovan." - downundermike
Comment
-
Originally posted by Melchior View PostIf they trade Bradford, they lose any picks that would otherwise come back to them from the Rams. They're trying to lock him up. Plus Bradford's refusing to extend his contract with any team but the Eagles. He wants to rebuild his value.
IF they do trade for MM, it won't involve trading Bradford. The intention may be for MM to sit behind Bradford and then possibly take his job next year if Bradford gets too expensive.
Everyone assumes Mariota will step right in and start, but I don't think Chip is going to start a rookie QB unless he has to.
Comment
-
The Eagles get Rams 2016 3rd round pick
Originally posted by Melchior View PostIf they trade Bradford, they lose any picks that would otherwise come back to them from the Rams. They're trying to lock him up. Plus Bradford's refusing to extend his contract with any team but the Eagles. He wants to rebuild his value.
IF they do trade for MM, it won't involve trading Bradford. The intention may be for MM to sit behind Bradford and then possibly take his job next year if Bradford gets too expensive.
Everyone assumes Mariota will step right in and start, but I don't think Chip is going to start a rookie QB unless he has to.
It's kind of a weird thing like the Eagles getting a higher pick from Buffalo if Stevie Johnson would have had a better year for SF.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pete View PostIf Bradford doesn't play at all for the Eagles in 2015.
It's kind of a weird thing like the Eagles getting a higher pick from Buffalo if Stevie Johnson would have had a better year for SF.
If they trade him for Mariota, they definitely lose the picks and Mariota or Sanchez will have to start this season.
Just do the right thing, you fuckers, and take the best WR/OL/DB on your board."If I was racist in my opinion of QB's, I wouldn't have a dog named Donovan." - downundermike
Comment
-
Bradford and Mariota will not be on the team together
Originally posted by Melchior View PostTrue, but if Bradford plays well enough to keep Mariota on the bench in year 1, that's probably more valuable than the pick.
If they trade him for Mariota, they definitely lose the picks and Mariota or Sanchez will have to start this season.
Just do the right thing, you fuckers, and take the best WR/OL/DB on your board.
Again-from my understanding the terms if the trade are: if Bradford doesn't play for the eagles at all this year, then the eagles get the rams third round pick next year, even if he's on another team's roster.
They can still draft those players
Comment
-
My understanding is that if they trade Bradford, it nullifies any picks coming back to the Eagles. I'll see if I can find that...
But ultimately, I agree that Bradford won't be on the roster with Mariota. I just don't think they're getting Mariota."If I was racist in my opinion of QB's, I wouldn't have a dog named Donovan." - downundermike
Comment
Comment