If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I actually think he has a lot of leverage, much of which the Eagles gave him when they cut Herremens. Without him, I'm very concerned about our O line.
I actually think he has a lot of leverage, much of which the Eagles gave him when they cut Herremens. Without him, I'm very concerned about our O line.
Mathis is already one of the top three guards based on pay, he is 33 going on 34, and being available for a trade garnered no takers. Leverage, what leverage?
It's absolutely amazing that they didn't address this in any way @ the draft.
A rookie to take over for Mathis at the same level? The draft was going to be need as it relates to value. No need to take a third round Mathis replacement if the Eagles didn't value any guard that highly (and at the expense of another guy they wanted).
A rookie to take over for Mathis at the same level? The draft was going to be need as it relates to value. No need to take a third round Mathis replacement if the Eagles didn't value any guard that highly (and at the expense of another guy they wanted).
Youre correct. I'm not saying they could have or should have drafted his replacement, but to not even think about Oline through 7 rounds was a mistake...especially with the oldest line in the NFL.
I am not sure how this thing got so ugly, but I imagine Rosenhaus has something to do with it.
Mathis has been obsessed with money for a long time. Even before he became unhappy with his contract, he was publicly griping about paying taxes all over social media.
Comment