The FFFluffers become the Chip Chompers become the Bradford Blowers. And still the team goes nowhere.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Usual Suspects.
Collapse
X
-
Just so I'm clear, if I think a cheap two year deal on Bradford is not a horrible move, because I don't think it prevents them from doing anything they would otherwise do if they hadn't re-signed him, and I would prefer Bradford to Mark F'ing Sanchez, does that make me a "Bradford Blower?""Listen to McCarthy" - Art Vandelay
-
reasons I didn't want to keep him:
1. 99% sure he'll get hurt
2. paid him 2 1/2 x more than it woulda cost sanchez to go out there & get same end result: season 51 of no super bowls. that's my end game. is it the eagles? I don't think so sometimes.
3. did signing him prevent getting fletcher cox an extension? on paper today it appears that may be the case.
4. sanchez is pretty much same guy as Bradford, honestly. except he's made playoffs a couple of times and won some big games. Bradford hasn't and I wouldn't spend north of $16m guaranteed in 2016 to see if that changes. A leopard cannot change its spots.
I just don't understand the logic of keeping Bradford around for another year or 2 when you essentially have Bradford as your #2 now for a lot lower price tag that gives you more flexibility on other contracts.
if nothing else they could have waited and gotten him cheaper after nobody else wanted him in free agency.
Comment
-
My only response to that is the Eagles
Originally posted by Ellsworth View PostI just don't understand the logic of keeping Bradford around for another year or 2 when you essentially have Bradford as your #2 now for a lot lower price tag that gives you more flexibility on other contracts.
if nothing else they could have waited and gotten him cheaper after nobody else wanted him in free agency.
Comment
-
Agree about the injury, but, again, this deal doesn't commit them to anything. They should still draft a qb to groom. I think they can still sign Cox.
As for Sanchez, we'll just have to agree to disagree. I've been watching him since he was a rookie with the Jets (not that that makes me an authority on the subject) and he is bad. He could never even match what Bradford did in the last 8 games. He's not capable of even being that "good." I want the Eagles to win a SB as much as anyone else, but at the end of the day, it is entertainment for me 5 months out of the year and I like it when the Eagles win and hate it when they lose. Bradford may not inspire dreams of a Lombardi, but the idea of Sanchez as the full time starting qb is horrifying.Last edited by McCarthy12; 03-02-2016, 02:39 PM."Listen to McCarthy" - Art Vandelay
Comment
Comment