Wasn't that the plan when they drafted him that he eventually would stay put at LT? May as well move him there, and keep him there now.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Does Lane move to LT?
Collapse
X
-
I agree it might be good to make the needed move sooner rather than later, but perhaps you don't want to F* up something that is ok right now. By moving him to LT right now you could F uc the chemistry at two spots on the line. Might be better to wait until the offseason.--------
"We choose to go to the moon."
Comment
-
or at least the bye?
Originally posted by IronEagle View PostI agree it might be good to make the needed move sooner rather than later, but perhaps you don't want to F* up something that is ok right now. By moving him to LT right now you could F uc the chemistry at two spots on the line. Might be better to wait until the offseason.
Comment
-
I don't think so
Originally posted by TRENT View Postthe youth movement is on.The crux of the biscuit is the apostrophe'
Comment
-
Originally posted by Birdwatcher View PostJohnson is playing well at RT and when they put him at LT in the preseason, he did not play well. Moving him midseason would be a risk, weakening both T spots. He may be our long term LT, but I think he would need an offseason to fully acclimate to the position. Pedey alluded to the possibility that big V could stay at LT and I think with some help from TEs and RBs he could handle it, but moving LJ now could make things worse on both sides.
If LT is the most important position on the line, and it is, I can't see not putting your best tackle (who's been groomed to play there) in that spot.
Comment
Comment