What the fuck is that play designed to do without blocking the end?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fuck you Gomer
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Spartan92 View PostSo glad he went for 2 when we were down 17 - 6.. Brilliant!
Oh and your QB is hot you call that hot garbage play lol
Anyway, terrible call.
Comment
-
-
I missed your post complimenting the play design that sprung Whiteside wide open on the previous 2 point conversion.
Scott and Wentz got tangled up on the last play. Can't say I liked the call.
The better team won.Last edited by Maniac; 10-18-2020, 04:38 PM.Blue Chip College Football - Coach Your College to the National Championship
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spartan92 View Post
Huh we would have needed 1 point to tie at the end of the game lol
This means that the next score would have come with the Ravens up 24-7. They would have kicked it, making it 24-14. Which is what the score was anyway after one failed and one successful two point conversion.
Anyway the call was horrendous and you’re right that they should have kept letting Wentz throw.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Maniac View PostI missed your post complimenting the play design that sprung Whiteside wide open on the previous 2 point conversion.
Scott and Wentz got tangled up on the last play. Can't say I liked the call.
The better team won.
The DE blew that shit up because Gomer is trying to get cute and the guy isn't even blocked when the play is running right into him.
And he's doing this with Joe Blows and Jim Whothefuckisthats on the OL ... and the game on the line.
Better team could have been BEAT ... they had the mo.Last edited by slag; 10-18-2020, 04:51 PM.Obscenity is the last refuge of an inarticulate motherfucker.
Comment
-
Fucking please. I didn't like that particular call either but he also made the calls that had them in a game that they had no business to be in. Maybe he was trying to keep Joe Blow from getting blown up on a blitz.Blue Chip College Football - Coach Your College to the National Championship
Comment
-
Originally posted by art vandelay View Post
So let’s say they kick it after the first TD. Then it’s 17-7.
This means that the next score would have come with the Ravens up 24-7. They would have kicked it, making it 24-14. Which is what the score was anyway after one failed and one successful two point conversion.
Anyway the call was horrendous and you’re right that they should have kept letting Wentz throw.
Not to argue but if they don't go for 2 so soon in the game, would they have had a chance to kick a point after to tie? 17 - 7 was a 10 point game why make it harder on yourself so early in the game so you are forced to go for 2 if you miss? It's just a stupid decision period.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spartan92 View Post
Not to argue but if they don't go for 2 so soon in the game, would they have had a chance to kick a point after to tie? 17 - 7 was a 10 point game why make it harder on yourself so early in the game so you are forced to go for 2 if you miss? It's just a stupid decision period.
Comment
Comment