Is Reno Mahe 2.0. The league figured him out. If Sanders can’t go Thursday we better pick up someone off waivers.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Scott
Collapse
X
-
Clement is even worse. How much longer are they going to let him hang around.Blue Chip College Football - Coach Your College to the National Championship
Comment
-
Originally posted by RSE View PostIs Reno Mahe 2.0. The league figured him out. If Sanders can’t go Thursday we better pick up someone off waivers.
As if Sanders got hurt we were set at the position or when he was off the field we had serviceable replacements lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spartan92 View Post
Ya all those football aficionados saying we were set at RB and we didn't need anyone cause we had Sanders Scott and Clement sure know their football let me tell ya. Not referring to you, just general sentiment across the board.
As if Sanders got hurt we were set at the position or when he was off the field we had serviceable replacements lol
Comment
-
This is why I've always said we should've kept Howard. Regardless of his situation in Miami, he's an experienced big back. They also missed out on Freeman. We need depth at running back. Sanders isn't a huge guy a can get hurt. Scott is great at swing passes and screens.. Which they're not even using him for like dumb asses. Not the type of back you want carrying the load though. He's smaller than most high school backs. Clement hasn't done a thing since 17 either. He was good behind Ajay and Blount.. That's about itLast edited by maggsgsr; 10-19-2020, 11:35 AM.
Comment
-
We all said they were playing with fire when they had nobody behind Sanders. Running back by committee is the logical solution for backfields. Bell cow running backs are too risky. What's worse is when you have to overpay them after they typically hit the wall after four or five years. Boston Scott is not a backup running back. He's a RB3. This team has as many RB2s as it does WR1s.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Snakebitten View PostWe all said they were playing with fire when they had nobody behind Sanders. Running back by committee is the logical solution for backfields. Bell cow running backs are too risky. What's worse is when you have to overpay them after they typically hit the wall after four or five years. Boston Scott is not a backup running back. He's a RB3. This team has as many RB2s as it does WR1s.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RSE View Post
Sputum92 says the board was full of posters who said nah we are fine at running back so I have to call FAKE NEWS on you.
Comment
-
For the record, I had a good offseason as a faux GM this year. I'm not gaybacking the threads but here's a few of my comments.
"Let's not forget he still has a hole in the backfield. You can't just have Sanders back there".
"I think if I was Howie and didn't know how to draft a wideout, I would have traded up for Lamb or the very least taken Jefferson (and probably another in the second round)."
"I'd rather have James Bradberry if he's cheaper. Playing in that division as a corner isn't easy and he knows how to actually tackle someone."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spartan92 View Post
ok I guess I will have to go back and read hundreds of posts but many were saying Sanders can be the bell cow and we were fine with Scott and Clement. There were posts about needing to add AP etc and some were saying we were fine there (and they know who they were) but if I must look back on them all I will find some examples no worries500 internet fights, that's the number I figured when I first joined igglephans. 500 internet fights and you could consider yourself a legitimate internet-tough guy. You need them for experience, to develop leather skin. So I got started. Of course along the way you stop thinking about being tough and all that. It stops being the point. You get past the silliness of it all. But then...after...you realize that's what you are.
Comment
Comment