Would it really matter if Foles got hurt?

[Maniac]

Sudfeld can't play worse.

[06hawkalum]

Sweet melt bro!

Where was this sentiment following the Giants game?

[art vandelay]

of course it would. against the giants the foles looked like the good backup we thought he was. against oakland, foles played like he did against dallas in 13. if he gets hurt, we're like the cardinals with ryan lindley in the playoffs a few years ago. zero percent chance of winning a game.

[06hawkalum]

of course it would. against the giants the foles looked like the good backup we thought he was. against oakland, foles played like he did against dallas in 13. if he gets hurt, we're like the cardinals with ryan lindley in the playoffs a few years ago. zero percent chance of winning a game.

Sweet Jesus...a rational assessment of the situation from an Igglephans poster! Will wonders never cease?

[dev_32]

Sweet Jesus...a rational assessment of the situation from an Igglephans poster! Will wonders never cease?

It wouldn't have mattered if we smoked the Raiders. The issue would have been the two receivers he missed, and how bad we will still lose to the Saints

[06hawkalum]

It wouldn't have mattered if we smoked the Raiders. The issue would have been the two receivers he missed, and how bad we will still lose to the Saints

Yep, folks like Maniac take pleasure in being negative and wear it like a badge of honor.

I mean, why hold out hope that the Eagles, who last I checked will have 44 players not named Foles in uniform, can win two playoff games at the Linc when you can just assume the worst and start the bitchfesr three weeks early instead?

[Maniac]

of course it would. against the giants the foles looked like the good backup we thought he was. against oakland, foles played like he did against dallas in 13. if he gets hurt, we're like the cardinals with ryan lindley in the playoffs a few years ago. zero percent chance of winning a game.

I've seen plenty of Nick Foles. The chance of getting three non-clunkers against playoff competition are zilch. One playoff win is the only realistic outlook.

[Maniac]

Yep, folks like Maniac take pleasure in being negative and wear it like a badge of honor.

I mean, why hold out hope that the Eagles, who last I checked will have 44 players not named Foles in uniform, can win two playoff games at the Linc when you can just assume the worst and start the bitchfesr three weeks early instead?

Yeah, I'm negative because 2+2=4. Your whining isnt going to change that.

Nothing to bitch about. You lose your MVP quarterback and you're fkkked. Thats the way it goes in the NFL.

[06hawkalum]

Yeah, I'm negative because 2+2=4. Your whining isnt going to change that.

Nothing to bitch about. You lose your MVP quarterback and you're fkkked. Thats the way it goes in the NFL.

There is a precedent for an NFL team losing their MVP QB late in the season and still winning the Lombardi.

The more you know...

[DEERSPINE GUY]

I WILL CONTINUE TO BELIEVE FOLES CAN GET IGGS TO PLAY IN FEBRUARY, UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE.
THE ONLY WAY IT WILL BE PROVEN IS IN JANUARY.

YEA HE WAS PRETTY BAD MONDAY NIGHT, BUT I'VE SEEN HIM BE PRETTY DAMN GOOD JUST A FEW YEARS AGO.

[TerpEagle]

It wouldn't have mattered if we smoked the Raiders. The issue would have been the two receivers he missed, and how bad we will still lose to the Saints

And Mills giving up that TD. Carr is trash and Brees will throw 11 TDs against him.

[Maniac]

There is a precedent for an NFL team losing their MVP QB late in the season and still winning the Lombardi.

The more you know...

... the dumber you get.

There you go. One out of 54. Solid, sunshine. Place your bet!

Although no drop off like Wentz to Foles.

[06hawkalum]

... the dumber you get.

There you go. One out of 54. Solid, sunshine. Place your bet!

Although no drop off like Wentz to Foles.

lol...why so mad bro?

[Maniac]

lol...why so mad bro?

Why so dumb?

[06hawkalum]

Why so dumb?

It's the way baby Jesus made me. What's your excuse?