The media doesn't have the gonads to say Michael Sam isn't worth drafting.

[art vandelay]

Michael Sam most definitely belongs in Frisco.

[nerd]

He may not suck, but I believe 9 of those sacks came against 3 terrible o lines. He will be a situational pass rusher, not really big enough for the line and doesn't move well enough to play LB

he harrassed johnny football all game long and that is going against some top talent on that o-line.

[Sect 236]

Seattle could afford that luxury. Frisco too. Both are 4-3's as well.

San Fran is a 3-4. Seattle runs a D similar to what Billy Davis runs.

[Eagle In Ohio]

So now we're gona pick and choose which sacks are good and which aren't ?

He may not suck, but I believe 9 of those sacks came against 3 terrible o lines. He will be a situational pass rusher, not really big enough for the line and doesn't move well enough to play LB

If you've seen the film on the guy, there's no way that you can say that he doesn't hustle his ass off and give 100%. To say that he sucks when he put up those numbers in the SEC is just dumb.

[common wealth]

I didn't say he sucks. And of course you want some context for his stats. Looking at stats in a vaccuum and basing your opinion off of them without a little bit of analysis about the level of competition he amassed the majority of those stats against is equally dumb.

[Drama Queen]

My bad regarding SF. Seattle runs a 4-3 as the base.

[Eagle In Ohio]

Is it not his job to get sacks ?

I didn't say he sucks. And of course you want some context for his stats. Looking at stats in a vaccuum and basing your opinion off of them without a little bit of analysis about the level of competition he amassed the majority of those stats against is equally dumb.

I know you didn't say that he sucks, but you can't say "only get sacks against the good o-lines so they mean more. He's a pass rusher. He did his job and he did it very well in what is considered to be the best conference in college football.