Originally posted by weizer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Would the Eagles have had more leverage if they had kept Desean Jackson
Collapse
X
-
You're delusional
Originally posted by weizer View PostDid you see RGknee last year, he couldn't hit the broad side of a barrel. Maybe their punt returns got more dangerous. Too much jumping the gun on here. Did TO make the cowgirls better? You got to have a qb that can get him the ball and not throw the ball to the other team, or get hurt.
And I believe in Chip.
Comment
-
I cannot figure out what part of 30 million dollars over the next three years people can't grasp here.
Nobody was trading for that contract ... and it's the reason the Eagles cut him.
Not gangs ... not his aversion to blocking ... not because he wasn't Harry's kind of player ... money.
Just like Revis, Ware and Peppers.Obscenity is the last refuge of an inarticulate motherfucker.
Comment
-
I'm going to explain the whole situation to you
Chip does not like DeSean Jackson.
Chip definitely does not like DeSean Jackson at that money.
Young players emulate veterans. Jackson is a bad influence on young players.
Jeff Lurie and Daniel Snyder are buddies.
Lurie and Snyder are more interested in making money than winning championships.
The dubious gang stuff about Jackson was designed to a) lower his value b) keep other teams away c) give Eagles fans an explanation for it c) make it easier for Snyder to sign him at a discounted rate
Comment
-
I see what you're saying
Originally posted by slag View PostI cannot figure out what part of 30 million dollars over the next three years people can't grasp here.
Nobody was trading for that contract ... and it's the reason the Eagles cut him.
Not gangs ... not his aversion to blocking ... not because he wasn't Harry's kind of player ... money.
Just like Revis, Ware and Peppers.The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is - Winston Churchill
Comment
-
Why does everyone keep saying this?
Originally posted by JDuggernaut View PostStill should have held on to him til the Draft. The Browns didn't need a receiver too badly til Friday. Might have gotten something out of them.
Comment
-
I already said why
Originally posted by ishimonster View PostIf you don't see how DJax on the foreskins makes them a better team.
And I believe in Chip.
Comment
-
Why did he have a career year?
Originally posted by Eagle In Ohio View PostBut it still doesn't make sense. Teams pay for performance. DeSean Jackson had a career year in his first year in that system. I think it's reasonable to think that he would only get better as he became more comfortable. If he had only put up 700 yards with 2 TD's, I don't think that anyone could blame them for letting him go. The numbers justify his pay rate, IMO. It's gonna send a real bad sign if it gets players to thinking that even if they perform at their absolute best, they'll be cut because the Eagles don't want to pay for that production.
Comment
-
That may be true
Originally posted by Melchior View PostRedskins + DJax > Redskins - DJax. I don't think he meant they're better than the Eagles.Last edited by weizer; 05-12-2014, 10:25 AM.
Comment
-
Did he perform or not ?
Originally posted by weizer View PostAsk yourself that question. Teams were cheating run because they were having so much success running the ball, that left Mejax in "single" coverage where they just threw the ball up for him to run under it, with his speed it was easy for him to have a big year. He had a crap year just the year before, and has never done anything in the postseason. He wasn't worth the luxury, he didn't block. We are a running team first under Chip, pass second. I don't know why i have to keep explaining this, you should have seen this watching the games last year. Chip was trying to trade him as soon as he got here because he didn't fit what he wanted...big blocking receiver that can get open when he needs to.Last edited by Eagle In Ohio; 05-12-2014, 10:34 AM.The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is - Winston Churchill
Comment
Comment