Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
And people say that school shootings are a bad thing.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by SCREAMIN EAGLE View PostThen what is your solution to teh problem? Nobody wants armed guards at schools but nobody can ever tell you what their solution is . And please don't come up with, "Just ban all guns".
You have open-carry enthusiasts walking around to different restaurants with shotguns and semi-automatic rifles slung from their hips and across their backs that even the NRA says that's a bad move - until of course they get chastised for having the opinion that any rational person would have.
In the United States, there are roughly 90 privately owned guns for every 100 people. That's absurd. And it's not because 90% of the population owns guns, it's because gun owners feel the need to own lots of guns. And those guns end up in the hands of people that shouldn't have them.
The "legal" ownership and purchasing of firearms in this country feeds the illegal and dangerous possession of firearms. A quarter of a million guns are smuggled into Mexico from the US annually. That's just to Mexico.
It's ridiculous the amount of guns available to people in the United States. It's far beyond necessary for home protection, hunting, etc.
The NRA and other pro 2nd Amendment groups (that fail to understand the purpose of the 2nd Amendment) continue to promote ownership through spreading fear and a historical myth of what real Americans are/were like. And in doing so, it's likely leading to a more dangerous state - helping to further feed sales.
People who don't acknowledge that gun are actually part of the problem need to wake up first and foremost. But few will even admit that the actual weapons could have ANYTHING to do with the violence they facilitate.--
Your Retarded
Comment
-
True
Originally posted by Eagle Road View PostTrue, but it will take EVEN LONGER to fix society.The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is - Winston Churchill
Comment
-
Originally posted by TerpEagle View PostI've never said ban all guns, but gun culture in this country and the money behind it are a significant part of the problem.
You have open-carry enthusiasts walking around to different restaurants with shotguns and semi-automatic rifles slung from their hips and across their backs that even the NRA says that's a bad move - until of course they get chastised for having the opinion that any rational person would have.
In the United States, there are roughly 90 privately owned guns for every 100 people. That's absurd. And it's not because 90% of the population owns guns, it's because gun owners feel the need to own lots of guns. And those guns end up in the hands of people that shouldn't have them.
The "legal" ownership and purchasing of firearms in this country feeds the illegal and dangerous possession of firearms. A quarter of a million guns are smuggled into Mexico from the US annually. That's just to Mexico.
Thats all well and good, but you never said what
It's ridiculous the amount of guns available to people in the United States. It's far beyond necessary for home protection, hunting, etc.
The NRA and other pro 2nd Amendment groups (that fail to understand the purpose of the 2nd Amendment) continue to promote ownership through spreading fear and a historical myth of what real Americans are/were like. And in doing so, it's likely leading to a more dangerous state - helping to further feed sales.
People who don't acknowledge that gun are actually part of the problem need to wake up first and foremost. But few will even admit that the actual weapons could have ANYTHING to do with the violence they facilitate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SCREAMIN EAGLE View PostThat's all great, but you didn't tell me how to protect schools.
In 2004, 38% of households and 26% of individuals said they owned guns. Nearly half of the gun owners owned 4 or more.
So, reduction in firearm production wouldn't disarm most people that feel they need to own a gun but it could reduce excess. And these numbers don't account for the "legal" purchasing of firearms that occur to provide weapons to criminals and/or people who shouldn't have a deadly weapon readily available to them.
I don't have specific policy solutions, but ownership, purchasing, registration, etc. should be more difficult.
At the present, until excess firearms get filtered and removed from the system, perhaps armed guards and bullet-proof vests are all we can hope for to keep out children safe. How nice. Regardless, perpetuation of the "need to own guns" is going to continue to cause problems.--
Your Retarded
Comment
-
Haha - you are using the global warming deniers gambit
Sure cherry pick shorter time periods and you can show an increasing "trend", just like deniers do when the only look at the last 5 years of climate data. That's why you have to look at as much data as possible. Even going back to 92 isn't enough, should go back at least 10 more years."I could buy you." - The Village Idiot
Comment
-
Originally posted by TerpEagle View PostI've never said ban all guns, but gun culture in this country and the money behind it are a significant part of the problem.
In the United States, there are roughly 90 privately owned guns for every 100 people. That's absurd. And it's not because 90% of the population owns guns, it's because gun owners feel the need to own lots of guns. And those guns end up in the hands of people that shouldn't have them.
"I could buy you." - The Village Idiot
Comment
-
Frontier Wild West Dodge City had stricter gun control
Comment
-
Originally posted by Riccardo View PostSure cherry pick shorter time periods and you can show an increasing "trend", just like deniers do when the only look at the last 5 years of climate data. That's why you have to look at as much data as possible. Even going back to 92 isn't enough, should go back at least 10 more years.
However, school shootings aren't on the same time scale of large climate shift. Changes in policy, laws, political climate, demographics can be considered to affect gun ownership and violence and they happen on much smaller time scales. I don't discount long term trends, but I look at shorter term trends as well and patterns are forming to show that gun violence at schools has risen significantly in recent years.
Regardless, the data you provided from a noted dubious source doesn't even include recent events. So your longer term trends are lacking in relevant data which could shift the numbers away from your conclusion.Last edited by TerpEagle; 06-11-2014, 03:26 PM.--
Your Retarded
Comment
-
Originally posted by Riccardo View PostMore misinformation. Most guns that end up in criminals hands come from corrupt dealers and illegal straw purchases, not stolen from law-abiding gun owners.
http://gunvictimsaction.org/fact-she...als-and-youth/
It's a simple numbers game, the more guns there are, the more people that have them. And they're not all good people.--
Your Retarded
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eagle In Ohio View Postis who's going to pay for all of the extra security at these schools ? Even if it meant helping to protect our school children, people aren't going to want to pay more taxes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TerpEagle View PostLong term - a shift away from gun lust and excessive and unnecessary gun ownership. Fewer guns available will lead to fewer gun in the hands of people that shouldn't have them.
In 2004, 38% of households and 26% of individuals said they owned guns. Nearly half of the gun owners owned 4 or more.
So, reduction in firearm production wouldn't disarm most people that feel they need to own a gun but it could reduce excess. And these numbers don't account for the "legal" purchasing of firearms that occur to provide weapons to criminals and/or people who shouldn't have a deadly weapon readily available to them.
I don't have specific policy solutions, but ownership, purchasing, registration, etc. should be more difficult.
At the present, until excess firearms get filtered and removed from the system, perhaps armed guards and bullet-proof vests are all we can hope for to keep out children safe. How nice. Regardless, perpetuation of the "need to own guns" is going to continue to cause problems.
Comment
-
How about we just go back to NOT giving every kid a gold star for "participation" and they learn how to overcome or live with whatever limitations god has given them.
That way they have a bit tougher skin so that when a girl turns them down (as most/all are young males) or they are told to get a job they don't go all ape shit on everybody because their feelings got hurt.
Maybe people should start looking at the correlation between raising a pampered society, and a raise in this kind of violence?Last edited by Eagle Road; 06-11-2014, 04:23 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eagle Road View PostHow about we just go back to NOT giving every kid a gold star for "participation" and they learn how to overcome or live with whatever limitations god has given them.
That way they have a bit tougher skin so that when a girl turns them down (as most/all are young males) or they are told to get a job they don't go all ape shit on everybody because their feelings got hurt.
Comment
-
Cool new invention for locking out the bad guys
A Muscatine teacher said he was tired of waiting for someone else to develop a way to improve safety in schools.
“The Sleeve” is a 12-gauge carbon steel case that fits around the door’s closer arm, securing the door from the inside. The Sleeve can withstand more than 550 foot-pounds of force, making it nearly impossible to open from the outside.
Comment
Comment