I don't follow you.
I'm saying, if the Rams were going to cut him they take a cap hit on a piece of his bonus.
They take the same hit if they trade to the Eagles with the Eagles only taking the salary.
My point is that the reason the Eagles did the deal, instead of just picks for Foles, could be that they control Bradford as potentially part of a deal with Tenn or TB (assuming the truth of the report that those teams want him).
And, if that doesn't happen they just cut him and, in effect, simply traded Foles for picks and the Rams are in the same place as if they cut him.
I'm saying, if the Rams were going to cut him they take a cap hit on a piece of his bonus.
They take the same hit if they trade to the Eagles with the Eagles only taking the salary.
My point is that the reason the Eagles did the deal, instead of just picks for Foles, could be that they control Bradford as potentially part of a deal with Tenn or TB (assuming the truth of the report that those teams want him).
And, if that doesn't happen they just cut him and, in effect, simply traded Foles for picks and the Rams are in the same place as if they cut him.
Comment