OT : FUCK the police

[IronEagle]

I read about 10 media sites every fucking day, including that one.

Drudge does nothing but link to other media, you twit.

And just because some guy here mischaracterized what an article stated, doesn't mean Drudge did it.

Now go back to your fucking bubble.

I disagree, Drudge is a douche. A complete and total douche. A clever douche, but still a douche.

To use the word you used, Driuge has mischaracterized many headlines
describing articles.

He knows exactly what he is doing and I'm pretty sure you know what he is doing as well.

You are a smart person..

Basically what Drudge tries to do is write headlines to slant the reporting of journalists from all perspectives to try and advance his personal extreme right wing ideological agenda. He'll write an extreme right wring headline to summarize an article, but if you actually read the piece in detail you frequently find the article had noting to do with the idea drudge was trying to push.

[IronEagle]

I disagree about Drudge ... if you have half a brain, you read the article that it links to and make you own conclusions.

And I read that particular article before this guy posted a reference to it ... the headline stated something about the over-militarization of the police and linked to an article that correctly identified the agents who were engaged in that action.

We are going to have to completely depart ways here.

I think Drudge is a complete douche.

You really agree with that guys approach to things?

I think he is dishonest in the way he represents things.

[The Ref]

We are going to have to completely depart ways here.

I think Drudge is a complete douche.

You really agree with that guys approach to things?

I think he is dishonest in the way he represents things.

Drudge, like Limbaugh, knows how to push the buttons of his largely uneducated audience. In Drudge's case, it's through two techniques: One is his deceptive headlines, and two is the editing by not posting enormously important stories that embarrass the GOP until they become too huge for him to ignore.

Drudge knows that most of his knuckleheads don't often click through to the story and just parrot his headline.

Honest news aggregators, which Drudge pretends to be but is not, post stories without political agenda. Fluffington Post is more or less the same on the left. The difference with Huffington is that they don't pretend to be unbiased and the people who read it know what they're reading.

But the far right are so inside their bubble that they have no idea that they aren't getting real information. They think Drudge and Faux News are unbiased sources of news and information.

[JuTMSY4]

Drudge, like Limbaugh, knows how to push the buttons of his largely uneducated audience. In Drudge's case, it's through two techniques: One is his deceptive headlines, and two is the editing by not posting enormously important stories that embarrass the GOP until they become too huge for him to ignore.

Drudge knows that most of his knuckleheads don't often click through to the story and just parrot his headline.

Honest news aggregators, which Drudge pretends to be but is not, post stories without political agenda. Fluffington Post is more or less the same on the left. The difference with Huffington is that they don't pretend to be unbiased and the people who read it know what they're reading.

But the far right are so inside their bubble that they have no idea that they aren't getting real information. They think Drudge and Faux News are unbiased sources of news and information.

A statement dripping with irony - do you often re-read your own facebook posts with nodding approval?

[The Ref]

A statement dripping with irony - do you often re-read your own facebook posts with nodding approval?

explain the irony. This will be rich.

[JuTMSY4]

So it was unintended?

You're telling my Huffpo is intentionally slanted but it's readers know it, but the majority of the readers of drudge are clueless boobs who fawn on his every word? (well really, someone else's every word). Maybe we know different Huffpo readers?

[IronEagle]

So it was unintended?

You're telling my Huffpo is intentionally slanted but it's readers know it, but the majority of the readers of drudge are clueless boobs who fawn on his every word? (well really, someone else's every word). Maybe we know different Huffpo readers?

Actually I would say that Ref has a point.

I read Drudge because it's a a sort of a "know my enemy" type situation.

I don't read the Huffington Post.

I'll give Drudge credit for the entertainment factor. I'll don't give his group much credit for the fact factor.

Are you claiming that Matt Drudge is a paragon of truth?

[JuTMSY4]

Are you claiming that Matt Drudge is a paragon of truth?

Does it look like I am?

I don't really have a problem with people proclaiming Matt Drudge to be a muckraker or an outright liar, but if someone wants to suggest that one side reads the "news" and knows its biased and the other reads the "news" and follows it like a lemming, they're probably full of shit.

Do you consider Drudge readers to be the enemy?

[noguano]

Sorry to blame the ATF for the UV incident. Also, there is much more in that article that is disturbing.

I get my news from many sources. Right now this country is fucked up. This Obamacare is a fucking disgrace.

2,700 pages and 20,000 pages of regulations. But Nancy did say we had to pass the bill to find out what's in it.

[IronEagle]

Does it look like I am?

I don't really have a problem with people proclaiming Matt Drudge to be a muckraker or an outright liar, but if someone wants to suggest that one side reads the "news" and knows its biased and the other reads the "news" and follows it like a lemming, they're probably full of shit.

Do you consider Drudge readers to be the enemy?

Before I would have to answer a question such as that I would have to know if you agree with his perspective.
I should also add that I belive he is somewhat misleading and I have a major problem with that.

[IronEagle]

Does it look like I am?

I don't really have a problem with people proclaiming Matt Drudge to be a muckraker or an outright liar, but if someone wants to suggest that one side reads the "news" and knows its biased and the other reads the "news" and follows it like a lemming, they're probably full of shit.

Do you consider Drudge readers to be the enemy?

I don't consider them to be the ememy.

But here is a flat out question: Do you take what he says to be the truth? Or should I say what he implies... because he never says anything... he just links to it!!!! LIke I said, he's clever.

[RSE]

You don't get my point at all. In fact, you make it for me.

[Marinate03]

Speechless...

How you gonna shoot a dog in broad fucking daylight?? Fuck cops! They're nothing but bitchass pussies that hide behind a little piece of metal.

[slag]

I'm not talking about the person.

I'm talking about the website.

It's nothing but links to other media ... and, come on, anyone making a judgment on an issue based on a headline is a dope to begin with.

[slag]

As I stated above, I'm not commenting on the person ... the website is nothing but links to other media.

And, as I also said above, anyone forming an opinion based on a headline is a moron to begin with.

I find his website convenient as a warehouse of information with a right slant.

Just like I find the Village Voice and Huffington a convenient warehouse for the other side.